Cottonmouth

11 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Nah he runs a different kind of offfense. Still run first, but back then we ran under Center basic runs. Babin is doing more reads and options from the gun.

Shouldn't be to many reads or options with 9 or 10 in the box.

38 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Qb is good and can scramble, and usually we have one or two decent receivers each year. Just not good enough to be a huge threat passing against teams like Pam, central, or even PNG/Nederland imo.

If you work at it, it can be good enough. I thing sense the coach was there when they made their run, he is trying to make work what worked 10 years ago. JMO

43 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Even if two plays are run up the middle it doesn’t necessarily mean they are the same play. And a lot of times those plays have reads that gives the qb an option.

Back in 2007 when we made our run we basically ran sweep, iso, power, and stretch. Only difference is back then the players believed that we could run it down people’s throats. We KNEW we were gonna win the battle up front. 

Was the head coach there when they made their run?

6 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Ok, so with the talent level that we have, what would you do different? We have a good qb but don’t have the speed to run the spread. Have the leading rb in the district so of course we are gonna utilize him. And if you watch film you will see that blown assignments are usually what stops a play from being a positive play. I don’t think it’s play calling being the issue, I believe Babin is doing the best with what he’s got.

We were in the red zone about 5 times against central and because of silly mistakes and penalties we almost came up empty in that game. At some point the players need to be blamed for stuff like that. We actually outgained Central, so I don’t think it all can be blamed on play calling...

The only thing I'm saying is that if you watch what is called, its first play up the middle, second play up the middle, third play run outside. That's 90% of the play calling. That is why everyone stacks the box against Lumberton. I know that the coach is working with what he has.

If #23, #39, and #3 on Lumberton's defense are on fire it will be a low scoring game.

On ‎10‎/‎21‎/‎2017 at 2:38 PM, L-Train11 said:

I predict that we will be getting a lot of young players playing time after we pull ahead in this game

If Lumberton don't do something with that offence it could be a long night. Lumberton has the talent on offence but the play calling is not to good.

What's your thoughts?

On ‎10‎/‎19‎/‎2017 at 4:31 PM, L-Train11 said:

Yeah. We have a pretty good back up, and our qb is a jr. Defense will return almost everybody

Now all Lumberton needs is an offence. They have the talent!

I think Lumberton will loose 3 maybe 4 on defense and 5 or 6 on offence

I was at the Lumberton/Vidor game and that #23 from Lumberton gave Vidor all they could handle in the first half. PNG's defense is young also, but the coaches watch film and will have them ready. PNG by 21.

Things have changed sense then. Those old records don't mean squat.

On ‎10‎/‎18‎/‎2017 at 0:33 PM, BearEssentials97 said:

This would help Ozen tremendously as long as the powers that be don't make them play up in 5A. There's advantages of being a big fish in a small pond.  Ozen Silsbee Lumberton LCM Bridge City is a good district.

I think Lumberton would win district if it ends up like this.

I hope they win out the next three games, even just to shut everyone up.

My bad, I guess they may have a bi.

Sounds like you have already given up on your team.