aki1994

Come on man! Y'all are hijacking my thread! Friggin people West of the Trinity, smh.

Ha. Good stuff. Maybe better at drawing up a 4 man WR play but some coaches still have't figured out that when you have two WR's to the left you should probably have 2 DB's covering them with a 3rd shaded over.

That is not the point. We were having a discussion about culture. 1989 to 2017 is a good generation gap and the question I posed to him was could the teams like 89' keep up with the spread offenses of today. So we dove down further and I wanted to get the boards opinion. Not for finger pointing or anything like that. Just some football talk for people who were there to see both.

Just a little historical chat for conversation. Also the 89 team season highlights are on youtube. My son will have a new favorite video to watch. How would you stack up the 1989 PN-G team versus the 2017 PN-G team? I had a long discussion with a good friend whose brother played on the 89 team and we agreed the 89' team would be too much physically for the finesse style of play we have now. Bost was a beast both ways. McGill would do his thing and Robertson was accurate with a big arm and line. On defense the 89' team had people that would hit (Carpenter brothers, Viola, etc) and some that played bat *bleep* crazy and would probably scare the piss out of the kids today (Binagia, Whitehead). The secondary with Bost, Gizzi, Droddy, Hart and Scott Young could hang as well so the wild card would be RJ. Thoughts?

So I wonder how they will make a bracket? As is two districts will battle it out for a spot in the regional final. If one district is much stronger you essentially will get a bunch of district re-matches.

Got it. So instead of 2 teams from 8 districts in Region 3 we will see 4 teams from 4 districts in Region 3.

I am still a little lost on how this plays out in the playoffs. Will there be less districts now? If so will the number of rounds in the playoffs decrease?

That would be good.

So possibly.... PN-G Vidor Nederland Crosby Dayton Barbers Hill Cleveland Beaumont Central Baytown Lee Beaumont Ozen

We lose Lumberton, PAM, Livingston and possibly both Beaumont schools leaving... PN-G, Nederland and Vidor locally. Do we get absorbed into a district with Crosby, BH, Dayton, etc?

Port Neches Groves Indians (10-1 7-1) 1 College Station (50 year old) Cougars ( 10-2 6-0) 99 Port Arthur Memorial Titans (10-1 7-1) 35 Temple Wildcats ( 9-3 5-1) -7 Silsbee Tigers ( 7-4 4-1) 19.5 Carthage Bulldogs( 12-0 6-0) 49.66 West Orange Stark Mustangs ( 10-0 4-0) 26 Madisonville Mustangs (JR) ( 11-1 4-0) 13

Stupid post. We had at least 6 false start calls before then and snaps that rolled back on the ground numerous times.

My bigger concern was seeing WR's lined up in the slot and nobody on the defense covering them. We never shifted. One play they hit a pass but it seemed they had a run play called and were flagged for an illegal man down field. Our D players have to be smarter than that.

I see what you are saying and RJ is a great player but I think you are a little off base. Bost can play QB and the snap issues were not on him. The new center struggled all night. RJ is a once in a generation type player for PN-G and if he were not there I am sure Faircloth would build his offense around the skill sets he has. There is a reason every QB he has had play for him sets new records. RJ has taken it to another level though with his ability and competitive nature and it has no doubt helped PN-G be more successful. Your point is right on but it is a little unfair to make the rest of the team out as bumbling idiots that can't play ball. Also I don't think that was your intent, it just came across that way.

Whenever the PN-G offensive starters come out on defense and the defensive starters on offense it will really throw Texas City off.

Going

Scott Young once used a metal clothes hanger to replace a broken antenna on a cordless phone. True story. I know it is hard to believe but I saw it with my own eyes.

I heard the PA Chiefs had two kids that got to PN schools play for them. Is that true? I was told they were allowed to since they started their when they were younger.

I am not getting into what ifs. Just trying to help explain what people might mean by Faircloth being conservative. Nederland played a better game. Plain and simple. Better game plan and better execution.

If you watched any PN-G games this year you would have seen that running RJ 40 times is not the offense he has ran. I think by saying conservative they mean he abandoned the pass. Hughes and Stansbury were getting one on one coverage and Stansbury did not have an incompletion thrown his way. Also all the pooch kicks when we have a kicker that can kick it out of the end zone was nerve racking. 10 or 15 yards is not a huge deal but when Nederland scored with only 13 seconds left it could have been.

#NOCOUGARS

I doubt they get to "question" the coach but he will take the time to go over plays and explain why they did what they did right or wrong.

I think the point of the thread was that #74 is a big kid. Not that he should be on defense in particular. It is not an official crying about the defense thread unless PNGwhatever1990 starts it.

Yes it was. Smart on Nederland's part. Reminds me of Lumberton mowing everything but the field for the youth games. Have to neutralize where you can.

that is not a PNG fan asking about the player.