Reagan

Birds of a feather flock together. As if we didn't already know what Comrade Harris was! [Hidden Content] @Big girl. @UT alum @HuntersLaptop2028 @CardinalBacker

And this. New Rasmussan poll: Trump 52% Harris 47%

I'll explain it with this latest: Trump 312 - Harris 226

Not blind, my friend -- I can see the swamp very clearly!

LOL! Paul Ryan, Chris Christie and Michael Steele! BTW, I believe Steele is a commentator on MSLSD. No good Republican would be caught dead doing this! With the exception of Pence, that whole list is deeply imbedded in the swamp! It's a badge of honor to have them against Trump. This tells me we are on the right track! This shows we have the swamp worried!!

Just heard on a national broadcast that hamas supports Coup-Mala for President. WOW, a terrorist bunch wants her over Trump. That aught to tell you everything you need to know!!

We usually get to pick our poison! LOL!

From the article: "Overall, we rate the Daily Beast Left-Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that favor the left. We also rate them Mixed for reporting due to "failed fact checks."" I read through this. When I saw Merrick Garland involved then I knew it was fake news. He's as evil as they come! [Hidden Content]

You know, I thought the same thing. I read through it and noticed there were no names attached as proof. So, this was nothing more than a political hit piece. @CardinalBacker

The short lived media hyped honeymoon is over for Coup-Mala! @CardinalBacker @UT alum

Even the pet gets it! LOL!

Walzo-Bazzarro must be bad. His own brother said Walzo is not capable of being a VP. BTW -- I did see where the DNC has started pushing more funds toward the down ballots. This is probably due to the fact that they realize DEI hire Harris is gonna lose. @CardinalBacker @Big girl @UT alum @HuntersLaptop2028

Absolutely! 😏

@CardinalBacker @UT alum @HuntersLaptop2028

Smith has a 69% win rate. Peevey has a 66.7% win rate. Smith has had over 10 wins 3 times. Peevey has had over 10 wins 2 times. It's my personal opinion that the LCM coach is over hyped. But, that's not letting the Silsbee coach off the hook. I had them penciled in to win State in 2022 but that didn't happen. So, I'm not as high on the Silsbee coach as I once was. But, between the two, Smith gets the nod!

I keep hearing that Walzo-Bazzarro does nothing but lie!

What -- you didn't know?!

She was also Montel William's call girl. It's the ones we don't know about is the problem!

This is really getting bad! @UT alum @HuntersLaptop2028

@Big girl @UT alum

FY1988 $909.2 billion FY 1987 $854.3 billion FY 1986 $769.2 billion FY 1985 $734.0 billion FY 1984 $666.4 billion FY 1983 $600.6 billion FY 1982 $617.8 billion FY 1981 $599.3 billion FY 1980 $517.1 billion Like I said, revenue nearly doubled with, after 1983, a consistent 4.6% economic growth. Revenue coming, low inflation plus excellent growth rate tells you how well the economy is doing. With massive spending increases and tax increases, Yobama's growth never got above, I think, 2%! Yes, facts are important.

I didn't say it doubled I said they nearly doubled. I am remembering as it happened. I wasn't looking and find this info. But here is some of it. From the article: "The Reagan tax cuts were implemented in three installments, with the top marginal rate falling to 50% from 70%. When the reductions were fully in effect in 1983, the economy snapped out of the recession, and real growth averaged 4.6% for the remainder of the Reagan presidency—more than his much-maligned “rosy scenario” ever promised. Economic growth faded as President Obama raised taxes and smothered the economy with unprecedented regulatory burdens. Without looking any further right now, I'd say the time frame I'm talking about would be sometime between 1983 and 1988. Plus you can see here what Yobama raising taxes did to smother the economy. [Hidden Content]

Silsbee has the better coach!

As per one of the headings: "So the spending cuts never materialized." The House was controlled by the Dems. As I said, and not debatable, Reagan's tax cuts almost double money to the Treasury. The Dems, led by that goof ball, Tip O'Neill, saw all that money and continued spending like a drunken sailor. But, the point, Big Girl, is that tax cuts work! We HAVE to control spending. The old saying, which do you believe: We spend too much or we are taxed to little?