TxHoops

I think they were using mainstream in a different sense. More like typical national media...get it?

Or any number of other racial epithets for Hispanics? Or uses a gay slur toward Michael Sam? That's why this is a questionable rule at best. Typical overreaction. If someone makes an offensive, derrogatory mark toward another player, fine their pants off.

  Basically, any national news outlet except for FoxNews...  

This rule is a landmine waiting to explode.  If you take what I assume to be the "spirit" of the rule, you wouldn't flag African American players for using the word.  I don't think anyone should be using it, but clearly they aren't using it in a derogatory or hurtful manner.  Why not just announce if you are caught on audio using it to degrade or demean another player, a hefty fine will be levied?  No need to change outcomes of games or leave this open to a split second official's decision.

  The Jerry Rice of QBs?

  Carr made some money with that run.  As for Bridgewater, no need to run.  If he's not going to run a faster time than Manziel (which he wouldn't), there is no reason to give Manziel another chip in the race for which of the two is the first QB drafted.

  He is going to make someone a very productive at worst, all world at best receiver.  He is as close to a can't miss first round pick as it gets.

For more information, contact Jay Dill at 951-9928.

If they wanted to give a HS coach a chance, Todd Sutherland or Brian English should be the choice.

Serious question:  Will African American players be allowed to use it?  Look, I am opposed to the word period.  My kids have never used it (around me anyway) and know it is more taboo than using the F word in my house.  However, I have noticed it is very prevalent around the kids of color that I am around.  They do use the variety that ends with -a, but use that frequently when talking to each other or about others.  I am curious if the NFL will make a distinction. 

  To me, as crazy as this sounds, this is almost the "safe pick."  Similar to when they took Earl (not that I think Manziel will be a HoF'er), Manziel would be a "popular" pick.  And if you pass on him, and he ends up setting the league on fire, you will look awfully bad.  I still think trading down is the way to go, if they can, but if they keep, I won't be surprised if they take him.  I just hope whatever they do, it works out.  I am a lifelong Cowboy fan but I really, REALLY like Rick Smith.  I want him to have a long and successful career with the Texans.

Meh, he will offer the ones who are deserving. And winning cures all. Don't worry...you guys will be back to taking our culls before the incoming freshman class graduates ;)

"This isn't going to end well for Chuck and the Stronghorns." Idk. If it comes down to Austin vs. Collie Station, we win every time. I always thought they should show those 100 boys a good time in Austin one night, and then bus them down to Bryan/CS the next. Let them compare apples and dog turds, so to speak.

This seems to be part of the whole "culture" stigma that has surrounded the University.  I am as guilty as anyone; I pay for my seats at DKR each year, and I don't really like standing up for the whole darn game.  I think the stadium can be as loud as any and have heard it get that way many, many times.  Much more important is the culture surrounding the team.  I don't believe that can be changed overnight.  However, I will say that based on the steps and rules he has implemented, Coach Strong is doing his best to do just that.  I think you see a different level of toughness from the start next year.  And 3-4 years from now you may just see the meanest group of Horns that have taken the field in a long, long time.

  Seriously, maybe even more amazing than Manziel's athleticism is how on earth a kid with hands and feet that big only grew to be 5'11".   Someone should do a medical study on the kid.  There was some serious growth-stunting going on with him somewhere along the way.

The Defenders/Texas Ball Hawks will be holding open tryouts this Sunday, February 23, at St Anthony's school at 850 Forsythe St, Beaumont. Come have your son tryout for a chance to be a part of the Under Armour sponsored basketball organization, the only program in Southeast Texas that is sponsored by a shoe company. The times for each age group will be as follows: 7th grade (13u) and 8th grade (14u) groups - 1 pm to 2 pm. 9th grade (15u) and 10th grade (16u) - 2 pm to 3:30 pm. 11th grade (17u) - 4:00 pm to 6:30 pm. All are welcome at tryouts. This program is designed to develop your son's game to its highest potential, while showcasing his skills at some of the top tournaments around the country.

Ouch!  But on point...

  I don't think most Aggies (at least the ones I talk to regularly) like the governor any more than the rest of us.

  Agreed.  Except you could make an argument to substitute "any" for "much" in your last sentence.

  This is almost all correct.  Except for the last sentence.  You actually can get a deferred adjudication with a conviction; however, it almost never happens.  It gets confusing but once you have a conviction, you are not "eligible" for probation.  This means a jury, if you are subsequently convicted of another crime, cannot give you probation, deferred or otherwise.  A judge still has this option though in sentencing.  Basically, a judge has authority to do what he believes is in the best interests of justice.  Again, very unlikely you would get deferred though with a previous conviction.  By the way, prosecutors, depending on the offense, often prefer deferred because is an offender messes up on their probation, they still have the full range of punishment on the original offense, which you don't with what we call "straight probation." 

Not chump change. Good for Mack. I wonder if he is content to ride away or if he still really wants to coach as he said? I don't think he would have a problem getting a job in a bcs conference.

I don't think calling a team out BEFORE the draft (saying if they pick someone else, it will be the biggest mistake they've ever made) will endear yourself to that franchise. Moreover, it reinforces the stigma of lack of maturity and poor decision making. At some point, this kid has to grow up or start listening to people who are trying to help him. I really hope he does. He is supremely talented and don't want him pissing a promising career away.

Fact of the matter is, there are laws in effect that allow one time offenders all the rights the rest of us have.  Depending on the severity of the crime, most felonies, at least in Texas, allow for "deferred adjudication" which is basically probation which, if successfully completed (i.e., you keep your nose clean) keeps a conviction off your record.  Then you can vote, own a firearm, etc.  Further, we now have a law whereby although this arrest and probation isn't removed from your record for law enforcement purposes, you can have it "non-disclosed" which means prospective employers, etc., can't find it when you apply for the job (information isn't available to the general public).  If you mess up again after all those second chance options, that's on you.    For what it's worth, I think those laws are good because a lot of people make a mistake in life, especially when they're young.  But they LEARN from it.  What was being discussed at the symposium is mostly ridiculous.  Lack of consequences in their life is how many ended up where they are in the first place.

  I hadn't thought about Baylor because they weren't previously in the mix.  PhatMack brings up a good point about proximity too.  Will be interesting to see if they are in the hunt.  Would make sense for them to be.

  Your source may be better than mine...my memory!  In fact, we can probably say "is" not "may" ;)   I only followed his recruiting because of his younger brother, Mickey.  It was kind of known that they would be going to school together (very tight-knit family), and Mickey was one of the top 10 kids in the country in his class at that time in hoops (he was a sophomore I believe).  I do know, as a Longhorn, Texas was never really in the mix for Mike (I assume not for a lack of trying).  I also remember OU being in his top 5 (I think - also main school I didn't want getting him), and FSU being considered a front runner (that was while watching the ESPN show at that Nike camp) due to his family originally being from Florida.    A&M should definitely be in the hunt.  Sumlin's going to need some help from Kennedy with Mickey to close the deal.  Before Mickey committed to tOSU to follow his brother, his other finalists were Duke, Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, UNC, OU, and UT.  So we are kind of like A&M, we were at least in the hunt for Mickey, but not for Mikey.  For either of us to get the one, we need to convince the other (IMO - still think they'll end up together).  My fear is both will end up at OU.    For what it's worth, for both of their sakes, I would much rather the Aggies land them than that place up North!