PlayActionPass

Is that your only comment on this game Crawford?

Blue and Yellow Purple and Yellow Easy mistake to make. Jasper wins by 3 TD's if they can squash the waterbug.

SA will take Shelbyville to the pasture and beat them like a rented mule. This game will not be close.

He's not tall, he is about 5'6. He is a waterbug, quick as lightning. Accuracy is ok, arm strength is above average.

I think Splendora has the advantage in a number of areas, but Lumberton is playing at home. Definitely a toss up game, but I'm taking Splendora. Splendora 24 Lumberton 17

This very true, but something tells me that Crosby will find a way to win this one.

My sincere apologies, did the Bears take it easy on them?

Delusional

They haven't played Livingston either. I think the fewest points Livingston has allowed was 28.

Touche'

Unfortunately or fortunately, depending on how you look at it, this is a TEAM game. When one player/coach is given a "penalty" the entire TEAM suffers. The coaches are the HEAD of the TEAM and therefore when they make a mistake, everybody receives the punishment.

All of this is "evidence" that leads the "common" man to come to the conclusion that there was some level of impropriety and/or deception involved.

That is a Classic right there.

The only blight to that stretch of road is Livingston is on it.

Naivete does not become you.

They already had all of the information prior to the meeting. They didn't go into the meeting blind. The facts are simple and the evidence is obvious. The parties involved (PNG) stipulated to the wrongful act of employing digital recording (picture taking) devices during the course of a contest. The only thing being contested is whether the information obtained from an illegal source was used during the course of the contest. However, the use of the device is violation enough to warrant forfeiture.

This is not a courtroom. And, you never ask a question that you don't know the answer to. Cross Examination 101.

Like i said in an earlier post, the votes were known before the meeting ever took place. Coach Barrow is smart and calculating, not reason to add fuel to the fire. Everything he says holds up, because nobody would want a coach to vote for selfish reasons. Just do what is right and honorable.

What selfish reasons do Vidor, Dayton, or Santa Fe have for voting in favor of the forfeit? Didn't Santa Fe actually have the probability of making the playoffs go down with the forfeit? I know BH had a playoff spot guaranteed and now they don't. Sounds pretty honorable to me. Definitely doesn't sound like cheating.

Well, if you've ever partied with any alter boys.......

Your right, you don't know the UIL. They will call additional witnesses and the truth will be sought out with extreme prejudice.

He's a lawyer. Not sure how good of a lawyer, but a lawyer just the same.

I'm thing BF might want to hold off on an appeal, some new and damaging information might come to light. That appeal process can get a little sticky when you start interviewing past coaches and what goes on during a normal Friday night in the press box.

Ok, sure. Maybe Monte doesn't want to give any more ammunition to PNG prior to them playing in two weeks. Everybody went into that meeting already knowing what the vote was going to be, Coaches talk to each other. Those quotes mean nothing, because 3 other coaches (5 if you count BH and Crosby) felt differently.

And you presume that he was just taking some general aerial shots for his scrapbook. Dude, why else would a coach take pictures of a football game from the press box unless he was going to look at them and analyze them and pass on that information to coaches calling the offense or the defense?