Sign in to follow this  

Nederland Babe Ruth League

Recommended Posts

Nederland Babe Ruth league is having sign ups at the Nederland Recreaction Center today from 11 am until 2pm. Cost is $165 for one player and multiple siblings are $115 each.  Also February 8th and the 15th at the same time and same place. All 13 to 15 year olds from Jefferson, Orange, Hardin,  and Chambers counties are eligible to play. Come and enjoy some fun baseball this spring.

Contact Gary Toups 4097180118 

                 Rickie Collins 4096262906

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The deadline for registration for the Nederland Babe Ruth League has been extended for the next two Saturdays February 22nd and 29th at the rec. center in Nederland on Ave. H. The hours are from 11am until 2PM. You may also register on line until  March 21st.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
post on nederland babe ruth Facebook page.
************ATTENTION TRYOUT DATE***************

One and ONLY one tryout will be conducted on May 14th at 6pm. Show up time at 545 to warm up. For the returning players on the Yard Goats and Roughriders you will need to try out. Show up in proper baseball attire. The draft will be held after tryouts. If you do not make tryout you will be a hat pick. 

Walk up Sign-ups are welcome at the cost of $165. Tentative date for Opening Day will be May 30th. 

Parents please practice social distancing while in stands or sit in cars. Not our rules. Plenty of room down foul lines to stand. 

Thank you for your patience and the League is excited for season to begin. Please password.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    Total Members
    Most Online
    Newest Member

  • Posts

    • Lol. Typical. Btw, how is LCM looking for this year?
    • No he just switches names 
    • No, it’s not all fair game. It has to be relevant to the trial however, if a defendant (or anyone)  takes the stand, you can impeach his testimony by trying to show that he is untruthful. For the guys to claim self defense in this case, I believe they are going to have to take the stand to explain their actions. They obviously don’t have to by law and their lawyers can try to make the case without it but it will be difficult with what I think the state attorney is going to bring. Dropping a case or being found not guilty has nothing to do with a lawful arrest. Probable cause is a way different standard than proof beyond s reasonable doubt. Yes I have seen officers sued and successfully. Deadly force is defined (at least in Texas) by statute. It isn’t merely “generally accepted”. DF used on a person is actual use of deadly force but the threat of deadly force (in Texas) with a deadly Weapon can get you up to 99 years in the hoosegow according who you threaten. Up to 20 years for everyone else. That is the mere threat and not even use. i disagree with your struggle over the weapon makes the use of DF would be “completely useable beyond question”. Welllll.... not so much. If a person displays a weapon and/or threatens DF when it isn’t lawful, he loses his use of self defense. I will quote Texas law (as an example as I don’t like looking at GA) on self defense not being lawful. In your terminology, if a mortal was initiated by the deceased. No, if the shooter had no legal standing for displaying the shotgun, morally initiating the struggle is legal by Arbery. He has just as much right of self defense and stand your ground against an unlawful use of force including the threat. This is Texas law when self defense is not lawful: >>>>>(2) did not provoke the person against whom the force was used; and (3) was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used. (b) The use of force against another is not justified: (1) in response to verbal provocation alone;<<<< Does not provoke... if the shooter had no lawful use of a shotgun to stop a man merely running (even away), then the shooter provoked the incident. Also, no defense when engaged in any crime other than C misdemeanor or in other words, a traffic citation. So if brandishing a firearm without the lawful use of self defense is a crime in GA, again (and I bet it is), the shooter broke the law and again, loses lawful self defense. So, you can’t commit a crime and then claim self defense. As my questions were, was an arrest lawful under GA law and was the display of a weapon to make that arrest in that situation lawful. If not lawful on either, case closed.  If the shooter displayed the shotgun unlawfully, it is Arbery that had the lawful right of self defense, not the shooter. I am not sure what the Michael Slager case has to do with this except even an officer can’t guess what “may” happen. If so the police could legally shoot anyone because they “may” do something. 
    • What’s your thoughts on Crenshaw?
    • At this rate, would this be any reason to kill an economy?!  Unless...
  • Topics

  • Create New...