Jump to content

**WEST HARDIN TOURNEY SCORE UPDATES**


Recommended Posts

[quote name="H-D BOBCAT 55" post="1344517" timestamp="1354213469"]
[quote author=Colmesneilfan1 link=topic=106880.msg1344515#msg1344515 date=1354213293]
Final:
Hull-Daisetta 61
Baytown Christian 34
[/quote]And it starts! HD!
[/quote]

Silly me - I was hoping you were a "One sport" supporter. ;D 8)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="H-D BOBCAT 55" post="1344520" timestamp="1354213624"]
[quote author=Colmesneilfan1 link=topic=106880.msg1344515#msg1344515 date=1354213293]
Final:
Hull-Daisetta 61
Baytown Christian 34
[/quote]How did Mosley and Lavalais look?
[/quote]

Lavalais not that good.  Not a starter.  Mosely...pretty good. Threw it down a couple of times, hit a couple of 3's, gets to the rim well.  HD gonna surprise a few.  Very big...athletic...a few good shooters.  Gonna be interesting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="knows2much" post="1344670" timestamp="1354225005"]
Varsity 4A losing to a JV2A in a 1A tournament....  those just might be grounds for losing your job.

Why is Lumberton even there?
[/quote]

They were scheduled to be in the Anahuac tourney but that tourney got canceled. Was a last minute schedule for Lumberton to get in the West Hardin tourney.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1344676" timestamp="1354225188"]
[quote author=knows2much link=topic=106880.msg1344670#msg1344670 date=1354225005]
Varsity 4A losing to a JV2A in a 1A tournament....  those just might be grounds for losing your job.

Why is Lumberton even there?
[/quote]

They were scheduled to be in the Anahuac tourney but that tourney got canceled. Was a last minute schedule for Lumberton to get in the West Hardin tourney.
[/quote]

well...I guess losing to a varsity 2A in a 2A tournament would've sounded better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scores from Thursday's games:

Hull-Daisetta              61
Baytown Christian      34

Kountze JV                57
Lumberton                  54

Kirbyville                    66
East Chambers JV        17

Spurger                      55
West Hardin              43



Games scheduled for today, Fri. Nov. 30:

West Hardin vs. East Chambers JV          10am

Kirbyville vs. Spurger                              1pm

Baytown Christian vs. Lumberton              4pm

Hull-Daisetta vs. Kountze JV                    7pm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...