Jump to content

TUESDAY NOV. 20 BASKETBALL Score updates/ Post'em


Recommended Posts

Here are the games for Tuesday, Nov. 20:

[b]Baytown Sterling 41,  Clear Springs  59      Final[/b]

[b]Beaumont Central 59,  Beaumont West Brook  66    Final[/b]

[b]La Porte 50,  Pasadena  52          Final[/b]

[b]Port Arthur Memorial 53,  Houston Furr    56        Final[/b]

[b]Port Neches-Groves 47,  Barbers Hill    59      Final[/b]

[b]Crosby 55,  Texas City  48        Final[/b]

[b]Baytown Lee 47,  Dayton  57        Final[/b]

[b]Northbrook 49,  Summer Creek  81    Final[/b]

[b]Tomball 44,  Kingwood Park  47          Final[/b]

[b]Bridge City 48,  Little Cypress-Mauriceville  65    Final[/b]

[b]College Park 91,  Livingston  40      Final[/b]

[b]Huffman 63,  Lumberton  50      Final[/b]

[b]Nederland 83,  Hamshire-Fannett    34      Final[/b]

[b]Vidor 57,  Evadale  30        Final[/b]

[b]Pasadena Rayburn 42,  Goose Creek Memorial  48    Final[/b]

[b]Crockett 66,  Diboll  51      Final[/b]

[b]Jasper 33,  West Orange-Stark  77      Final[/b]

[b]Woodville 52,  Buna  58    Final[/b]

[b]Caney Creek 52,  Shepherd  40      Final[/b]

[b]Warren 36,  Splendora    68        Final[/b]

[b]Big Sandy 75,  Tarkington  39    Final[/b]

Deweyville at Sabine Pass

[b]Goodrich 26,  Hardin    87      Final[/b]

[b]Chireno 49,  Brookeland  48      Final[/b]

[b]Zavalla 45,  Wells    40      Final[/b]

[b]Beaumont Legacy 73,  West Hardin  55          Final[/b]

Leggett at Broaddus

Beaumont Kelly @ LC St. Louis Tourney
                    [b]58  vs. LC Washington-Marion  67    Final[/b]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kelly lost to Lake Charles Washington-Marion 67-58.  Leading scorers for Kelly were Shad Wise(17), Andrew Pace(15) and Cam Franks(14).  Kelly was down about 20 at the half but cut the lead to 5 and had the ball with 3 minutes left in the game.  W-M made their free throws to hang on at the end of the game.  W-M dominated the glass the entire game.  Kelly plays tomorrow for 3rd place at 5:30 against New Orleans Walker.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...