Jump to content

What was the 1st HS football game you saw? (with knowledge of the game)

Mr. Buddy Garrity
 Share

Recommended Posts

PN-G bamatex

PN-G bamatex

Posted
Posted
The earliest game I remember was the '99 State Championship. I was in the first grade and didn't fully understand what was going on, but I think I knew the basics.

The thing I remember most about that game, though, was the SEA of purple covering the Astrodome. That was an awesome sight.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BMTSoulja1

BMTSoulja1

Posted
Posted
My first football game was the last  year of Lamar football.  I was a little kid and I didn't know what was going on.  All I remember was rolling down the hills at LU Stadium.  The game that I actually do remember was '92 or '93 I believe.  Central Vs. West Brook.  Beaumont bowl.  I remember seeing Leeland McElroy whipping some booty.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
D3zii

D3zii

Posted
Posted
Since I played football at French I always Knew :)..But when I was little I always watched them on T.V. The first game I went to in Person which made me want to play was when I was in the 3rd or 2nd grade and I watched Beaumont Hebert beat Gainsville in the state game by like 4tds... (back then it was the pvil)...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Buddy Garrity

Mr. Buddy Garrity

Posted
  • Author
Posted
[quote name="BMTSoulja1" post="1029428" timestamp="1311975383"]
My first football game was the last  year of Lamar football.  I was a little kid and I didn't know what was going on.  All I remember was rolling down the hills at LU Stadium.  The game that I actually do remember was '92 or '93 I believe.  Central Vs. West Brook.  Beaumont bowl.  I remember seeing Leeland McElroy whipping some booty.
[/quote]That game came on Channel 6, i believe it was a day-time game. Wasnt Jeff Hopper the QB for Central?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
liltex

liltex

Posted
Posted
Game i remember more than any @ Bronco stadium 1966 bi-dist game.Bronchos(how it was spelled back then)up 7-0 w/under 2 min.to play & Hardin-Jefferson driving.H-J scores 6 w/seconds left.H-J behind on penetrations goes for 2.Recievers are well covered and just before the qb gets sacked he lobs the ball right in the middle-up for grabs and the CENTER catches the arrant wobbly pass and the umpire signaled a score.There were fans furious on the Dayton side and the coaches ran on the field in protest.Protest denied H-J wins 8-7.Game protested in Austin,ruling stood as called.Tat game was a war defensively.We were p-oed for months/years.I posted a long time ago the game was w/HF and it was H-J >:( 8)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Pirate_pride_07

Guest Pirate_pride_07

Posted
Posted
[quote name="WOSgrad" post="1029484" timestamp="1311983763"]
[quote author=mytwocents link=topic=86110.msg1029480#msg1029480 date=1311983286]
Man yall are old  ;D  ;D  ::)  8)
[/quote]

Careful there, sonny boy! >:( >:( >:( ;D
[/quote]
Hey i may be young but i ain't young enough to be called that.  ;D  :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TradinUp BH

TradinUp BH

Posted
Posted
[quote name="Mr. Buddy Garrity" post="1029436" timestamp="1311976974"]
[quote author=BMTSoulja1 link=topic=86110.msg1029428#msg1029428 date=1311975383]
My first football game was the last  year of Lamar football.  I was a little kid and I didn't know what was going on.  All I remember was rolling down the hills at LU Stadium.  The game that I actually do remember was '92 or '93 I believe.  Central Vs. West Brook.  Beaumont bowl.  I remember seeing Leeland McElroy whipping some booty.
[/quote]That game came on Channel 6, i believe it was a day-time game. Wasnt Jeff Hopper the QB for Central?
[/quote]
I played in that game and we shut Leeland down on a goal line stand for 4 downs inside the 5 yard line. It was the football season of 1991. WB won!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NHS1990

NHS1990

Posted
Posted
[quote name="JSnipes" post="1029410" timestamp="1311973854"]
I might have some of the facts wrong here but this is the first game I remember watching...I was 5 or 6

1988 (could have been 89) PNG vs. A&M Consolidated at the Astrodome. I believe A&M won 35-0
[/quote]



The year was definitely 1989. The score however, I don't recall it being that big of a blow out (could be wrong).
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest UHCoog14

Guest UHCoog14

Posted
Posted
Did not know Coach Shaver. My cousin  Gene Isabell,  Sr.  was HC there for a few years.

I can remember watching them play Mojo in the state finals. (after he had left there unfortunately)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • UT alum
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By UT alum · Posted

    • CardinalBacker
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...