Jump to content

Whats the call?

no-look

By no-look
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

no-look

no-look

Posted
  • Author
Posted
[quote name="FanintheStands" post="746741" timestamp="1263997614"]
[quote author=LAZEEK link=topic=64991.msg746725#msg746725 date=1263996566]
Asked my brother in law he said an intentional foul results in two shots regardless of what kind of shot it is and the bucket would count if the player was shooting and they get the ball
[/quote]There's no chance that a technical foul was called?
[/quote]No tech.......not flagrant just int....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Cook

The Cook

Posted
Posted
If a 2-point shot is made & an intentional foul is called, 2 points good, 2 ft's & the ball is awarded @ the spot closest to where the foul occured. It is the exact same procedure if the 2-point shot is missed.
If a 3-point shot is made & an int. foul is called, 3 points awarded, 2 ft's & the ball is awarded @ the spot closest to where the foul occured. Now, if the 3-pointer is missed, then it is 3 ft's
& the ball is awarded @ the spot closest to where the foul occured.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
horndawg

horndawg

Posted
Posted
New situation:

Team A is winning by 5 or more points.  Clock is running down.  Team B creates a turnover from Team A as clock is about to expire.  Team A player excessively shoves and throws elbow into inteceptor (worthy of a technical foul) just after buzzer sounds.  Should technical be given even though it will not change outcome of game?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Cook

The Cook

Posted
Posted
horndawg, from your description of this play it would not be a technical foul because this is a live ball contact foul. Rather it would be an intentional flagrant foul which does not matter if it affects the outcome. The NFHS rule book states that all fouls except flagrant will be ignored if no effect on the game outcome is derived. Because of the Texas C.O.P.E. program & potential legal liability that officials are subject to nowadays is what has driven this to be a rule. Judging by the " excessively shoves and throws elbow into inteceptor " then you would have to penalize this foul. Sorry guys!!!!!!!!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • BS Wildcats
      Fake Pandemic Scam Part 2?!

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...