wosgrad-84 Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Just for giggles since there will be no football this week who would win between these two teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hjhawks Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 west brook................................. nothing against wos, but size, strength, DEPTH..... really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOS95 Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 i'd have to say west brook. wos has as much talent as anyone who steps on the field with them. in this case, however, i think west brook would just be too much to handle. i will say though, it would be fun to see how christian michael would do against a cornel thompson chain gang defense. 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
82 5A State Champs Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 West Brook! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gladiator2 Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Yes, this is very funny. West Brook 56 WOS 13. Stump has the best offense around with a powerful RB. WB too much to handle!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigWolf10 Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Yes, this is very funny. West Brook 56 WOS 13. Stump has the best offense around with a powerful RB. WB too much to handle!! WB TOO much debt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serpentor Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 WB, but it wouldnt be a blow out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOS87 Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 WOS 10, WB 7 in a repeat of the classic 1984 upset Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFDM COOP Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Closer than people think! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 Brook scores in the 40's against WOS, before they pull the starters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katdaddy Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 Close first half, WB pulls away in 2nd.....42-14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruin4Life Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 Close first half, WB pulls away in 2nd.....42-14 katdaddy knows west brook football ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griff Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 No 3A school, even one as good as WO-S, has any business playing a strong 5A school. WO-S would make a respectable showing, but would lose it in the 2nd half. WB has too much size and depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
82 5A State Champs Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 No 3A school, even one as good as WO-S, has any business playing a strong 5A school. WO-S would make a respectable showing, but would lose it in the 2nd half. WB has too much size and depth. Size? yes! Team speed? Yes! Depth? Not yet! GIve us about two more years, and we'll have some depth. We currently only have around 46 players on the varsity roster on Friday nights. I'd like to see somewhere in the mid 60's in a couple of years. But no, WO-S shouldn't be much of a problem! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griff Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 No 3A school, even one as good as WO-S, has any business playing a strong 5A school. WO-S would make a respectable showing, but would lose it in the 2nd half. WB has too much size and depth. Size? yes! Team speed? Yes! Depth? Not yet! GIve us about two more years, and we'll have some depth. We currently only have around 46 players on the varsity roster on Friday nights. I'd like to see somewhere in the mid 60's in a couple of years. But no, WO-S shouldn't be much of a problem! Only 46, huh? Still, on average, a successful 5A program will typically have more depth than WO-S who suits out between 25 - 30 players every year. WO-S coaches traditionally get the most out of the numbers they have, which keeps them a stout 3A team that would also be very competitive in any 4A district, but a 5A district would be too much to keep up with in a 10-week season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
82 5A State Champs Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOSHIGHc/o2001 Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 I hate hearing this. LOL Its hard for Mustang fans to hear this. Although its logical. How many players does WOS have? I'd say around 25-30. What if this same game was played with both teams having the same number of kids allowed to play?? (Since this is all for fun) Would the outcome be different? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gasilla Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 I think The Brook would probably win, but it would not be a blow out. Probably more like 24-14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Majestyk Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 West Brook should win because they have to, they would never live down losing to a 3A school as a powerhouse 5A school even if it is WO-S. But should aint got nothing to do with it, I'd take WO-S 48-16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 West Brook should win because they have to, they would never live down losing to a 3A school as a powerhouse 5A school even if it is WO-S. But should aint got nothing to do with it, I'd take WO-S 48-16. Ha ha ha ha ha. Are you clueless or just stirring? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOS92 Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 Depth makes it impossible for a team of 25 like WO-S to beat WB. But if you presented some fantasy situation in which the teams were equalized - like starters only - WO-S handily. WB has been reasonably good in recent years, but has had horrifically awful years. WO-S always finds a way to field a winning team - usually dominant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest abovetherim Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 My sister lives down from WO-S stadium, I played against those guys and they are ALWAYS good. However, I'm not sure the starters this year versus WB would win "handily". Heck, they (WB) may have the best RB in the country. Their O-line and D-line is better than WO-S. The skilled positions outside WB RB would be a wash. I'd give the nod to WO-S coaching staff because Coach Hooks has multiple state championships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 Brook top 22 against WOS top 22 is still a blowout for WB. WOS way too small to stop the running game. Dayton should have taught you guys something. Your own posters said Dayton was too big and athletic. It would only be worse against the Brook this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dirk Diggler Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 That was a dam scrimmage with 2 starters missing. Sorry, wouldn't happen now. Close game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tigersvoice Posted September 19, 2008 Report Share Posted September 19, 2008 I'm not sure whose "rooster" would win, only the hens can say that, but Westbrook would outlast WO-S in this matchup on the football field. Sure would be fun to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.5280c733203c02b00df30cf5e6edbab0.thumb.jpg.1722bbe93d1613cc60ea62c49ac24881.jpg)
Recommended Posts