UT alum Posted yesterday at 05:42 AM Report Posted yesterday at 05:42 AM You know, I like to play a little blackjack from time to time. I’ve studied the game a bit and done my share of observation at the table. There is a limited number of hands that are advantageous to the player on a double down bet. I’ve seen people make it a little ways doubling down on losing hands. I’ve never seen one leave the table a winner. No wonder Trump bankrupted a casino. The Miller double down might leave the whole Republican Party walking away from the table bankrupt. AggiesAreWe and DCT 2 Quote
thetragichippy Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago A bold move, I would of made him Press Secretary - lol Trump did him a solid by appointing to chief of staff. He can continue with whatever agenda he wants and Stephen will not have to go before congress if subpoenaed. Quote
UT alum Posted 20 hours ago Author Report Posted 20 hours ago 3 hours ago, thetragichippy said: A bold move, I would of made him Press Secretary - lol Trump did him a solid by appointing to chief of staff. He can continue with whatever agenda he wants and Stephen will not have to go before congress if subpoenaed. You’re looking the wrong way, pal. This was a change election. The people want to see legislative action. One of the Chief of Staff’s primary duties is to coordinate the White House’s legislative agenda to Congress. Stephen Miller will prove incapable of operating in that capacity, driving the Republican Party deeper into the hole. Press Secretary would have been a much ch safer move. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 5 hours ago, UT alum said: You’re looking the wrong way, pal. This was a change election. The people want to see legislative action. One of the Chief of Staff’s primary duties is to coordinate the White House’s legislative agenda to Congress. Stephen Miller will prove incapable of operating in that capacity, driving the Republican Party deeper into the hole. Press Secretary would have been a much ch safer move. Legislative action like impeaching Hegseth that failed today? Quote
DCT Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 22 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: Legislative action like impeaching Hegseth that failed today? January is approaching fast. That is when change begins not anytime sooner. Today was just dress rehearsal. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 48 minutes ago, DCT said: January is approaching fast. That is when change begins not anytime sooner. Today was just dress rehearsal. You are correct. A dress rehearsal that they are not going to pass any legislation that brings prices down, they are going to try and remove Hegseth and Trump instead of waiting for the next election to Democratically remove them. I can’t wait, this will help Republicans. Quote
ZacharySmith Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 2 hours ago, thetragichippy said: Legislative action like impeaching Hegseth that failed today? Alan Dershowitz: "So by the standards that this guy, Thomas Massie, has espoused, he should be impeached because he is violating the Constitution." "He's saying that Hegseth should be impeached for violating the Constitution, but he's calling for impeachment on grounds that were explicitly rejected by the framers of the Constitution." thetragichippy 1 Quote
UT alum Posted 11 hours ago Author Report Posted 11 hours ago 3 hours ago, thetragichippy said: Legislative action like impeaching Hegseth that failed today? No. $13.50 minimum wage. Big income tax increase on incomes over $500,000. Restore MEDICAID and SNAP benefits gutted by the bbb. Forbid sitting members of Congress trading stocks. You know, stuff that got Republicans whacked in this election. Simplest playbook I’ve seen yet. We’ll get Hegseth in January. And Blanche. And RFK Jr. Don’t need to get Trump. He’s done. Quote
UT alum Posted 11 hours ago Author Report Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, ZacharySmith said: Alan Dershowitz: "So by the standards that this guy, Thomas Massie, has espoused, he should be impeached because he is violating the Constitution." "He's saying that Hegseth should be impeached for violating the Constitution, but he's calling for impeachment on grounds that were explicitly rejected by the framers of the Constitution." Alan Dershowitz? Are you serious? There is no bigger shill for the Republican Party. Quote
UT alum Posted 10 hours ago Author Report Posted 10 hours ago 2 hours ago, thetragichippy said: You are correct. A dress rehearsal that they are not going to pass any legislation that brings prices down, they are going to try and remove Hegseth and Trump instead of waiting for the next election to Democratically remove them. I can’t wait, this will help Republicans. What are you talking about? Hegseth is not elected. Trump cannot be re-elected. Hegseth will be removed come January through Constitutionally granted powers, i.e. democratically. Quote
baddog Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 42 minutes ago, UT alum said: No. $13.50 minimum wage. Big income tax increase on incomes over $500,000. Restore MEDICAID and SNAP benefits gutted by the bbb. Forbid sitting members of Congress trading stocks. You know, stuff that got Republicans whacked in this election. Simplest playbook I’ve seen yet. We’ll get Hegseth in January. And Blanche. And RFK Jr. Don’t need to get Trump. He’s done. Quote
UT alum Posted 9 hours ago Author Report Posted 9 hours ago 40 minutes ago, baddog said: Reaganomics is dead. It died November 2, 2026. Quote
UT alum Posted 9 hours ago Author Report Posted 9 hours ago 4 minutes ago, UT alum said: Reaganomics is dead. It died November 2, 2026. November 3, 2026. Quote
UT alum Posted 9 hours ago Author Report Posted 9 hours ago 56 minutes ago, baddog said: This is why it died. The vote on the 3rd was as much anti-billionaire as anything. This wasn’t a Trump mandate. It was a true mandate. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Porter Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 6 hours ago, UT alum said: This is why it died. The vote on the 3rd was as much anti-billionaire as anything. This wasn’t a Trump mandate. It was a true mandate. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Guess you totally forgot about the plandemic (Covid) where the largest transfer of wealth in history occurred. Remember 4 shots because the first one worked so good. Smh Quote
baddog Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 8 hours ago, UT alum said: This is why it died. The vote on the 3rd was as much anti-billionaire as anything. This wasn’t a Trump mandate. It was a true mandate. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up All part of the communist manifesto. Make the middle class poor and rob the wealth. What part of that are you unable to see? Quote
UT alum Posted 12 minutes ago Author Report Posted 12 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Porter said: Guess you totally forgot about the plandemic (Covid) where the largest transfer of wealth in history occurred. Remember 4 shots because the first one worked so good. Smh That’s old, fake news, bud. Quote
UT alum Posted 10 minutes ago Author Report Posted 10 minutes ago 55 minutes ago, baddog said: All part of the communist manifesto. Make the middle class poor and rob the wealth. What part of that are you unable to see? That is the heart of Reaganomics. Rob from the poor, give to the rich. Could you not interpret the graph? Quote
Porter Posted 3 minutes ago Report Posted 3 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, UT alum said: That’s old, fake news, bud. Nothing fake about it, do your research BUD. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.