Baytown Lee @ Nederland

[ghostbuster99]

3 hours ago, Reagan said:

LOL!

PS, you think Nederland had better talent than Crawford?  Or were they better coached?!

From what I watched Nederland could have beat them by 2 tds. As a full team yes they we're equally talented. Crawford coaches just stopped using what was working for them.

[tvc184]

5 hours ago, robbin said:

where did that say 3 td passes? he had 2 passing and 1 rushing thanks tho!

1 to summers, then 1 to contreras, then 1 rushing 

Really?

The exclamation points and emoji didn’t give it away?

[navydawg31]

1 hour ago, ghostbuster99 said:

That is also apart of the problem Nederland is still living in the past while everyone else is passing them up. Having a system is good when you have the kids to run that system. Good coaches adjust their system to the talent that they have at the time. I'll come back to this post in 2 years after these kids have graduated, so we can see if that is still the case.

I don’t disagree that good coaches have to adapt. But I think you’re confusing a system with a specific scheme. Nederland’s identity has never been about running the exact same plays or refusing to evolve. It’s about the standard: discipline, fundamentals, toughness, preparation, accountability and playing for the guy beside you.

Every generation is different, and obviously you have to put your players in positions to succeed. But there’s a difference between adapting your scheme to your personnel and abandoning the principles that made your program successful.

That’s really my point. Nederland has never needed to have the most stars in the district to compete. They’ve historically maximized what they had and made 11 players function as one.

Schemes change. Personnel change. Coaches change. The standard shouldn’t. That’s what I mean by “the name on the front, not the back.