LumRaiderFan Posted December 29, 2025 Report Posted December 29, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Reagan Posted December 29, 2025 Report Posted December 29, 2025 3 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Personally I think it's quite obvious what it was meant for. It was meant for the freed slaves to be able to become citizens of the US. Now, I don't think it's a coincidence that the 13the Amendment freed the slaves. Then the 14th makes sure they get citizenship. But the telling part is: "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof"! If a tourist comes and gives birth, that person is not "subject to our jurisdiction." I really don't think our founding fathers had this is mind. But why has it been perverted over the years. Could just be ignorance. Could be fraud involved. Who knows? But I think the Supreme Court will right this wrong! LumRaiderFan 1 Quote
Big girl Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago On 12/29/2025 at 12:31 PM, Reagan said: Personally I think it's quite obvious what it was meant for. It was meant for the freed slaves to be able to become citizens of the US. Now, I don't think it's a coincidence that the 13the Amendment freed the slaves. Then the 14th makes sure they get citizenship. But the telling part is: "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof"! If a tourist comes and gives birth, that person is not "subject to our jurisdiction." I really don't think our founding fathers had this is mind. But why has it been perverted over the years. Could just be ignorance. Could be fraud involved. Who knows? But I think the Supreme Court will right this wrong! Anyone on US soil is subject to our jurisdiction. If a tourist came here and killed someone. He is going to jail Quote
OlDawg Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, Big girl said: Anyone on US soil is subject to our jurisdiction. If a tourist came here and killed someone. He is going to jail Not the same ‘jurisdiction’. Please read the link below for a better understanding of the arguments ‘for’ and ‘against’ automatic birthright citizenship for anyone on U.S. soil. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up A really simple explanation about citizenship is found in the final act of an immigrant becoming a citizen the LEGAL way. The last thing they have to do? Say the Pledge of Alllegiance, or the Oath of Allegiance. Now, they are fully under the jurisdiction of the United States. (Remember the Pledge of Allegiance? What we all had to say in school before the liberals decided they’d prefer a multicultural, non-cohesive country with no identity, pride, or patriotism because it was all offensive to someone?) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.