baddog Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Can anyone believe liberals have Jerry Nadler investigating Pam Bondi after his huge failure with Russia Gate? What a joke. Quote
Porter Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, baddog said: Can anyone believe liberals have Jerry Nadler investigating Pam Bondi after his huge failure with Russia Gate? What a joke. Very hypocritical no doubt. baddog 1 Quote
OlDawg Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 44 minutes ago, Porter said: Good Interview Reason is a solid news and opinion magazine. Very trustworthy source. But, it will equally offend Dems and Reps on occasion. It’s a Libertarian publication that’s been around a long time. I recommend more people read it for a different viewpoint. Porter 1 Quote
thetragichippy Posted 29 minutes ago Report Posted 29 minutes ago 14 hours ago, Porter said: So all of Epstein’s victims were paid off? Even the ones that are dead? Question, why should you or I be more concerned about the pedo's than the ACTUAL victims? The victims that are alive and living their best life have SAID they have the list....... Quote
thetragichippy Posted 22 minutes ago Report Posted 22 minutes ago 14 hours ago, Porter said: I am a big fan of Elon and I think that’s great of him to offer but Is he going to pay for 24 hour security for them and their families the rest of their lives too? Question 1. - if Obama and Biden administration had the names, can you make it make sense to me why they didn't go after them? Question 2. Do you really think this is to the level that accusers and families will need 24 hour security for the rest of their lives? Quote
Porter Posted 19 minutes ago Report Posted 19 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: Question, why should you or I be more concerned about the pedo's than the ACTUAL victims? The victims that are alive and living their best life and SAID they have the list....... That’s a question you need to ask Trumps influencers who use it as a campaign issue. You know Bongino, Patel, Donald Trump Jr. etc. The list is long. If the reporting I read is correct no one in the DOJ will meet with them. Trumps influencers made it a concern to get him elected. I am just following up. It’s one of the reasons i voted for him. I believe this is a political platform to discuss political issues and this is just one of them. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 17 minutes ago Report Posted 17 minutes ago 14 hours ago, Porter said: Even the ones that are dead? Were Trumps influencers Patel, Bongino and the rest of them aware of this when they were using it as a campaign promise to get the Epstein perpetrators including Don Trump Jr? Was the DOJ paid for their silence too? I'm not sure about the campaign promises....I do know not all campaign promises can be done. I said that when Obama was running and was going to take care of terrorist......until he got the intelligence when he won his first term. if the DOJ was paid for their silence, it would of started with the Bush administration and remained through the current administration......without one single leak.....that in it self seems impossible Quote
thetragichippy Posted 14 minutes ago Report Posted 14 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Porter said: That’s a question you need to ask Trumps influencers who use it as a campaign issue. You know Bongino, Patel, Donald Trump Jr. etc. The list is long. If the reporting I read is correct no one in the DOJ will meet with them. Trumps influencers made it a concern to get him elected. I am just following up. It’s one of the reasons i voted for him. I believe this is a political platform to discuss political issues and this is just one of them. Of course this is discussion - The question still remains - why don't they go public. If he 25 year DOJ is correct in his assumption in my original post, they will not disclose for fear of being sued. Money above morals? Quote
Porter Posted 13 minutes ago Report Posted 13 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: Question 1. - if Obama and Biden administration had the names, can you make it make sense to me why they didn't go after them? Question 2. Do you really think this is to the level that accusers and families will need 24 hour security for the rest of their lives? 1. You’d have to ask them that. 2. Yes, you don’t think powerful people take out other people that would make them look bad and black ball their business dealings going forward? Quote
Porter Posted 10 minutes ago Report Posted 10 minutes ago 1 minute ago, thetragichippy said: Of course this is discussion - The question still remains - why don't they go public. If he 25 year DOJ is correct in his assumption in my original post, they will not disclose for fear of being sued. Money above morals? Why can’t the DOJ disclose it and let these powerful people come after the DOJ? Is that not the number one thing that our government is suppose to do? ….Protect Us. Quote
Porter Posted 7 minutes ago Report Posted 7 minutes ago This was Pam Bondi yesterday…literally. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.