Jump to content

2006 Coaches Poll


Recommended Posts

5a

1. Southlake Carroll

2. Katy

3. Lufkin

4. Euless Trinity

5. The Woodlands

6. Northshore

7. Westfield

8. Judson

9. Longview

10. Garland

4a

1. Highland Park

2. LaMarque

3. Ennis

4. Brenham

5. Texas High

6. Copperas Cove

7. Denton Ryan

8. Stephenville

9. Calallen

10. Marshall

3a

1. Cuero

2. Gilmer

3. Wimberly

**4. WO-S**

5. Abilene Wylie

6. Gainsville

7. Giddings

8. Hutto

9. Sweetwater

**10. Jasper**

2a

1. Tatum

**2. Newton**

3. Marlin

4. Daingerfield

5. Omaha Pewitt

6. Altair Rice

7. Lexington

8. New Boston

9. Jefferson

10. Mart

1a

1. Windthorst

2. Chilton

3. Alto

4. Bremond

5. Shiner

6. Roscoe

7. Goldthwaite

8. Iola

9. Albany

10. Nazareth, Electra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Living 4 Friday Nights

I was thinking the same. But gosh they are such a big school with athletes maybe that's why. Good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking why was Jasper in there also, they're rebuilding. Silsbee would have been a better choice at #10. The top 5 are probably accurate. Gilmer wil be tough with that Kinne kid moving there as their QB. Giddings might be a little high, too. That QB and FB are tough but their defense better be a lot better than it was last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest bulldogbark

cause Jasper is Jasper and we always find a way to give some team problems...Its just our way of doing things...kinda like a bee buzzing around your head you can swat em...but some day you will get stung :D:D:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest bulldogbark

I didnt think we gave BC any problems last year...but we like for people to think like that....its a great feeling to play superior teams like BC...being such a young team as we are...thank you for your humbling comment...you have reminded Jasper were their place is :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest Jody

Yeah more like why is Jasper in there....????? I was thinking the same thing..........HAHA.

Why are either of them there? Seems to be an annual mistake made by the coaches. Better yet, where is Bridge City?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest bulldogbark

and your guarantee is worth what? a I told you so at the end of the day? a one week hiatus to make sure nobody remembers you saying it? wait its just bold talk before the season even starts. but we do enjoy being put in our place. we humble ourselfs before you :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...