Jump to content

Splendora 47 Livingston 55/FINAL


Recommended Posts

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to Splendora 47 Livingston 55/FINAL
6 hours ago, catfever said:

This game was a lot closer than I would have thought.  Livingston beats Hamshire-Fannett and Huffman and then barely beats Shepherd and Splendora.  

They are tied with HJ going in to Friday’s game I believe. That game is in Sour Lake so I’m gonna have to give the edge to the Hawks. Looks like these 2 are gonna grab the top 2 spots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jerry West said:

@whsalum do you think that the Lions can play with the Hawks.  I'm going to watch Nederland vs Crosby if not I would make my way out there.  Lions must be solid though to beat Hamshire and Huffman.  HJ has made district look easy and Livingston not as easy so I am wondering if they can really hang with the Hawks.

I don’t think the Lions will hang with the Hawks at Sour Lake. They aren’t bad but I’d take HJ by 10 at home. It may be a closer when the two teams meet up in Livingston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...