-
Member Statistics
45,988
Total Members1,837
Most Online
-
Posts
-
By CardinalBacker · Posted
By my guess a bump stock ban would have saved roughly half of the lives lost in Vegas. But then again, I forget that your trigger finger is as fast as full auto, so it wouldnt have mattered. -
Out of all of your comments, this might be the most ridiculous; “fight for the right to slaughter kids”. Please point out anyone who believes there is a “right to slaughter kids”… and you call other people nuts? You still don’t answer the questions and go back to emotions. Should people be arrested for something that isn’t a crime? Should the Supreme Court ignore the Constitution in favor of emotions? Would a ban on bump stocks have prevented any crime? -
-
-
Seemed like a natural move for Erickson to me too. Just seeing a lot of insinuations toward what you say. As I said, I know nothing of anything going on behind the scenes; just a lot of chatter about it. And completely agree on the new hire. His wife and her sister are excellent in their own rights so was happy to see him back in OF with the head job.
-
-
Topics
-
.jpg.5280c733203c02b00df30cf5e6edbab0.thumb.jpg.1722bbe93d1613cc60ea62c49ac24881.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.