Jump to content

Who is the better team Silsbee or WOS and why?


Recommended Posts

Guest ST4life

WOS has the better team but i think Silsbee will beat them in 3 years or less. WOS is like the Roman empire of football in this district but we all know it was finally conqered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^... Haha, you had to get edited by Coop. What bad did he put Coop?

WOS will not ALWAYS be the best team in setx, but they should be able to match up with some of the best every year.

Silsbee is 'Loaded' with talent either. They just have some more athletes stepping up this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until the champ is beaten they are still the champ.  Saying that, WOS currently would have to be considered the better team.  Silsbee does have some talent but they are young this year.  If anything the Tigers may start slow ,but the Tigers will be a force for the next several years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ST4life

WOS will always be the best team in southeast texas regardless of who you compare them with

wrong again WOS is going to be a good team but not the best every year someone will come along and beat them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You crazy if you think WO-S can step on the field with PAM or WB.

.....and you're crazy to think they can't.  Consistently over the past 20 years WOS has been synonymous with winning, district championships, and playoffs.  PAM has yet to live up to their hype although talented.  WB is definitely turning the corner after several dismal years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.....and you're crazy to think they can't.  Consistently over the past 20 years WOS has been synonymous with winning, district championships, and playoffs.  PAM has yet to live up to their hype although talented.  WB is definitely turning the corner after several dismal years. 

At this exact point in time--NO they cant, if it was the past couple of years YES they could beat both, but not right now they cant.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

.....and you're crazy to think they can't.  Consistently over the past 20 years WOS has been synonymous with winning, district championships, and playoffs.   PAM has yet to live up to their hype although talented.  WB is definitely turning the corner after several dismal years. 

Not exactly. I have to go with Scooter on this one. WO-S doesn't have the numbers anymore to play consistently with the larger teams.  They have a great history behind them but it was time to drop to the lower classification. The Mustangs last three years in 4A there were no playoffs.

As far as hype, WO-S hasn't exactly lived up to their hype going into 3A and haven't been any better in the playoffs than WB or PAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not exactly. I have to go with Scooter on this one. WO-S doesn't have the numbers anymore to play consistently with the larger teams.  They have a great history behind them but it was time to drop to the lower classification. The Mustangs last three years in 4A there were no playoffs.

As far as hype, WO-S hasn't exactly lived up to their hype going into 3A and haven't been any better in the playoffs than WB or PAM.

Nicely stated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not exactly. I have to go with Scooter on this one. WO-S doesn't have the numbers anymore to play consistently with the larger teams.  They have a great history behind them but it was time to drop to the lower classification. The Mustangs last three years in 4A there were no playoffs.

As far as hype, WO-S hasn't exactly lived up to their hype going into 3A and haven't been any better in the playoffs than WB or PAM.

Thats exactly what im going off of. No way they have more talent than those 2 teams. Coaching only gets you so far, i'll give them best coaching staff but they wont come close to beating those two teams. The players have to do it, and i dont think they have as many GAMEBREAKERS as those 2.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest wos country

OH WE HAVE THE PLAYERS TO DO IT JUST NOT ENOUGH OF THEM. WE'RE 3A DEPTH IS AN ISSUE. WE BEAT A VERY GOOD DAYTON TEAM AT THEIR PLACE LAST YEAR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not exactly. I have to go with Scooter on this one. WO-S doesn't have the numbers anymore to play consistently with the larger teams.  They have a great history behind them but it was time to drop to the lower classification. The Mustangs last three years in 4A there were no playoffs.

As far as hype, WO-S hasn't exactly lived up to their hype going into 3A and haven't been any better in the playoffs than WB or PAM.

No, we couldn't play up to the 5A schools and win - most likely. But we certainly have proven that we can still play with the 4A teams. Last year we beat Dayton 26-9, as well as beating Bay City and LCM. The year before that, we beat Bay City and two playoff teams from the local 4A district - district champ Central and also Nederland. The year before THAT, our first in 3A, we beat Nederland and Central, losing to Bay City, who went 9-2.

Our record against 4A teams - very few of them "weak" - since dropping to 3A is 8-1. That includes - over the course of just three years - two of the undefeated district champions from the former District 20-4A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOS probably would have been the 4A champs in that district down south.  PAM may have all of the talent in the world but they have yet to live up to their potential and hype.  Ozen had more talent than nearly every team in their district and couldn't do squat last season.  WOS expects to win and does.  I can't believe I am defending a foe. :P

This is a Silsbee-WOS thread go start a bigger school thread if people want to beat their "We are big school therefore we are better" chests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...