spidersal
Members-
Posts
1,461 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
spidersal last won the day on May 4 2024
spidersal had the most liked content!
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Baddog glad to see Javier finally have a good game. I know it is rare for him to pitch good but glad he did
-
Yes aggiesarewe, they were 7-4 in 2024 However I said they have been bad for several years. They were 7-4 that year but they were not a good team The last 3 games showed that, especially the Texas High game where they were embarrassed. The 2 seasons you have correct about being pretty good were 2020 and 21
-
KF89 reacted to a post in a topic:
Nederland @ West Orange-Stark
-
You are absolutely correct NHS, however they lost the last 4 games because of a defense that was bad. The Montgomery game, where if they would have won, they would have been 2nd and would have hosted got a playoff game. However the defense completely shut it down in the last quarter vs Montgomery and then proceeded to travel to Texarkana, where they completely been embarrassed I really believe Texas High could have scored a 100 if they would have wanted to
-
Thanks aggiesarewe, however several to me is more than 3 and 25, 24, 23, 22 were bad, that is more than 3. If several is more than 4 to you, then you are correct, however the record posted from 25-22 was 15-27
-
The only years that you have with a good season is 2020-2021. 2021 they set at the house with a 4-3 district record. Don’t even mention 2024 when they chocked in the last district game and got embarrassed by Texas High, a team that PNG beat in the playoffs. Why did they get embarrassed Can you say because their defense was horrible you are still tremendous with stats, however you still have no answer about what it takes to win
-
Yes that was a question, why because several posters raved about all the talent they had this season. It was a sarcastic post because of all the ones bragging about all this talent. When I saw the WB game, I sure didn’t see a lot of talent. If they have this talent, they sure didn’t show it. Again, let me emphasize, when you lose several years in a row, you have a losers mentality, unless the coaching staff can change it. I simply do not think they have a quality coaching staff and that is my opinion
-
I never in my post said they were talentless. I said obviously there is not MUCH talent
-
I got you but 26 a game is pretty sad look at the last 4 years, right at 30 a game you may call that ok, but I sure don’t. Good defense to me would be averaging 14 or less. I would not call averaging anything above that good
-
Good pitching tonight, just need to start hitting. If they can put those two together they will be tough to beat. The big problem now is that they are struggling hitting with risp
-
I certainly understand what your saying which is a good point, however when you average giving up that type of average for several seasons in a row, I question talent level, coaching, and team’s mentality. I would imagine you would have a lot of doubts about winning when you have been losing for several years with most games not even being close
-
Ole Aggiesarewe has all the answers. I really don’t think all the teams you mentioned have been averaging giving up about 35 a game for the past several years. Since you seem to have all the answers, you tell me why they have been playing so bad for the past several years. Is it turnovers, penalties, injuries, poor coaching, a lack of talent. I could go on and on
-
cal81 reacted to a post in a topic:
Nederland @ West Orange-Stark
-
So where is this talent that just gave up 33 points. If they had a little talent they would not have given up 33 points. So again if they have talent why are they play so poorly?
-
The answer is simple. A culture change and good coaches. Neumann did it and he had several good assistants like pate and Spell. It is obvious that the dogs do not have a whole lot of talent, but you can overcome that through hard work and having football since. Those things can be taught. When you have a ton of penalties and are known around the area as playing dirty you want win many games. Also, you have to teach how to have success after several losing seasons. PNG doesn’t seem to have a problem with that. Why, because they hired a coach that believes in defense 1st and he has very good assistant coaches. Unfortunately Nederland does not!
-
KF89 reacted to a post in a topic:
Nederland @ West Orange-Stark
-
KF89 reacted to a post in a topic:
Nederland @ West Orange-Stark
-
I wouldn’t call it being negative, I would call it being the truth. If that hurts your feelings , maybe you shouldn’t post. I take it giving up an average of about 40 points a game last year and 33 already this year is good defense. You might think so, but I sure don’t!
-
EyeNoBetter reacted to a post in a topic:
Nederland @ West Orange-Stark
-
EyeNoBetter reacted to a post in a topic:
Nederland (28) West Brook (33) — GAME THREAD — FINAL
-
I see ole BigDog doesn’t like reality. I simply stated that all these folks were talking about how good they were going to be this year with all the returners and these tremendous players from the JV and freshman teams. However they forgot that when you continue to lose, you get that loser’s mentality. They were about as bad as you can get last year and after watching the WB game they are still pretty bad and if you think they can compete against a much better team than WB, maybe you came from the moon. It is great to be for your team and I applaud you for that, however I think one needs to be realistic about a team and a program that has been poor the past several years. Again they have not played good defense since Delbert Spell retired and that has been a few years!