Englebert

Have you done your research yet. I fully expect you to do this and return to this topic admitting you were wrong. (I was laughing so hard when I typed that I almost couldn't finish it.)

I listen well enough. After being bombarded for years and years with false accusations of racism, bigotry, misogyny, many other isms... I've gotten pretty adept at sniffing out bull.

He refused because there were no charges to bring. That lie has been perpetuated by the Liberals for years and has been soundly rejected. Do a little research. Edit: I was wrong. Obama refused to bring charges because it would set a precedent that the next president should seek charges on him. And he doesn't want to go to prison.

Are you actually trying to belittle Trump when the opponent of Trump is the most corrupt nominee in the history of America? One that has a documented history of lying. One that was fired (fired by a lawyer) for unethical practices. The current president has also been caught in multiple lies. And if all you can do is spew out cheap petty shots about his mannerisms and hair, I don't think you are versed enough in the relevant issues to make a discussion remotely compelling.

Where do you find these people? I've been white all of my life and know quite a few white people, and I don't know a single one that fits your description. Sounds like this is just your fantasized stereotype of white people...the exact thing you find repulsive when applied to you.

But you believe white people hate groups of people. That's the same type of negative stereotyping that you find so repulsive.

I find it odd and disconcerting that you think stereotyping is wrong but you yourself engage in this practice on a regular basis.

Hillary's biggest problem is she just doesn't know how to deliver a speech full of false hope and empty promises. She can say the words, but she can't sell the false narrative like Obama or Bill. She's just too transparent...thus the distrust.

If this absurd statement has any semblance of truth, why wasn't our credit rating lowered when Bill shut down the government...twice? Don't answer. I don't think I can handle the Mensa-like statement forthcoming.

I'm surprised she was quoting from that show. After all, it portrays a wall, and Liberals hate walls.

Are you actually trying to call most people on this site stupid? This coming after you clearly demonstrated (on several occasions) that you don't even know the difference between deficit and debt. Us stupid people have no problem clearly seeing who you are.

Such an imaginative and thoughtful response. Did you lift this from one of your many far-left "news" outlets or was you just watching a re-run of A Few Good Men?

It actually took you this long to read the Liberal talking points before formulating this opinion? Liberals were trying to push this hilarious idea all day yesterday. One congressman actually tried to say Trumps comments were tantamount to treason. Liberals sure know how to show selective outrage. It makes for good comedy routines until we realize that many sheeple actually believe them. I wish Liberals would have shown just a tiny fraction of this fake outrage when they found out Hillary was hiding a server in her basement that held classified information.

Sounds to me like he just reads the Liberal talking points for the day and regurgitates them on here.

Do you really think anybody gives any credence to such false stereotypes you are trying to portray? But more importantly, do you feel like you bolstered you perceived intelligence level with your audience when you make these types of statements?

What in the world are you trying to say? Nevermind. Reply tomorrow when you're sober.

Who's speaking? I turned it off. Edit: Nevermind. Lost my buffer to turn it back on. I'm already back to Seinfeld re-runs.

Yeah, he's generous to the tune of $20 trillion dollars of debt. If that's your definition of generosity, then please, let's start drawing up the secession papers. Liberals are always generous with other people's money. That is an odd quote in the context of this topic. Did you even read or understand my post, or did you just want to try to insert an irrelevant jab instead of adding anything to the discussion.

I can't watch this train wreck anymore. Some lady Democrat (I didn't catch her name) congressman just said that Trump's comments today are paramount to treason. Let's see, Hillary hiding an unsecure email server that has classified emails running through it doesn't qualify as a security breach, but Trump asking the Russians to hand over the 30,000 emails Hillary illegally deleted constitutes treason on his part. We've just identified another nutjob congressman. I'm going back to watching Seinfeld re-runs.

Sorry, I try to avoid personal attacks, but it is clear you are not intelligent enough for this discussion. Try taking a basic high school economics course then get back with me.

I and others have repeatedly asked him to provide proof of Trump's racist remarks. He can't do it. But he still tries to claim Trump is a racist. The Left will try to paint Louis Farrakhan as a racist if he put a "R" behind his name. new tobie is just repeating the lies put out by the Democrats. TxHoops is the only one that has provided what could possibly be some evidence. The page would not let me scroll so I couldn't read the article. It was from the Huffington Post so the validity is highly questionable. The statement (I could only read the first paragraph) was from a long time ago and probably hear-say. I'm sure if evidence exists the New York Times would have already published it. But as long as the Democrats keep trying to push the narrative, new tobie will keep pushing it on here, regardless of lack of evidence.

One that tried to prosecute without the ability to prove intent and one that chose to not prosecute but could show intent.

We might have to build a wall around the whole state to keep those left behind out. That could be costly.

I'm sure they will mention it. Although LumRaiderFan provided you some links from like-minded sources, I applaud you for waiting for the "real" no-spin stories.