Jump to content

setxathlete14

Members
  • Posts

    2,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by setxathlete14

  1. So splendora out b.c in
  2. Lcm freshman vs lumberton lost 9-14 Lcm Jv vs lumberton wins 28-18
  3. Well I beg to differ doesn't some refer to lumberton as the friendly raiders? Lol
  4. I believe Jeff matthews from vidor did too 1 or 2 years
  5. I remember Eckert played a season or 2 for that arena team we had here. He was legit.
  6. Mcm. That's all.
  7. True. May the best team win and stay healthy!
  8. That's not coming from them. Specifically stated THE reason for losses were the 3/4 starters were out. Which is a valid point. I'm just giving them a hard time.
  9. I disagree....The magnifying Glass on that situation was absurd. Way more absurd than it should have been. All the way across the board people were legit concerned lcm was gaining wos starters for the first time in history.
  10. Pretty simple x and o there. Good players missing is good players missing. That's impactful regardless of your opinion on WHY they're missing or if they've played a snap . LCM still won games with multiple starters out. We didn't use that excuse even though it may have been a valid one had we lost.
  11. Don't think he started as a sophomore like the other group did. That was probably the difference
  12. Improved. Will need to play their best game Friday. I think lcm will need to score 40 to have a chance.
  13. Other than way better concession food. I think all they did was add some porta pottys
  14. Funnier situation is the one who went back, spent his entire year last year playing on jv waiting om eligibility, then goes back and was a day 1 starter for them... sends a great message there lol
  15. Let say, Lumbertons qb moves to Silsbee or wherever else....... never plays a down for them. Expected to suit up and play the next week. You're telling me that wouldn't be an impactful player? Blasphemy...
  16. Key players missing is key players missing I didn't know the reason they're out changes whether they're impactful or not... BUT we're in good shape either way. Just NOT as good as we would be lol
  17. No, That was for WOS
  18. He really is. He had a 99 yard run last year against HF was it??
  19. Why not? He's not playing regardless of the excuse. He's a truely impactful player
  20. He was one of our west orange transfers that couldn't get his papers signed.
  21. Well this one worked for Lumberton at the beginning of the year. We can use it too????. Our starting rb isn't back this week. They said next week I think he's eligible 🤣🤣
  22. Bears D better get it together or they'll give up 69 in this single game.
  23. Unless it was 07, 2022 or 2023. Non-issue lol
  24. Lol I prefer over .500 to be a winning record
  25. 5-5 not winning records
×
×
  • Create New...