Jump to content

Wonderboy

Members
  • Posts

    175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wonderboy

  1. [quote name="KJB324" post="1325555" timestamp="1352518484"] [quote author=BADSANTA link=topic=106041.msg1325517#msg1325517 date=1352518105] [quote author=Wonderboy link=topic=106041.msg1325500#msg1325500 date=1352517890] If I recall, there were a lot of people saying WOS has no "O". ::) [/quote] Silsbee missing 5 starters on defense [/quote] It's week 10 no excuses. [/quote] Exactly
  2. If I recall, there were a lot of people saying WOS has no "O". ::)
  3. [quote name="Farmer Fran" post="1323297" timestamp="1352380241"] [quote author=Wonderboy link=topic=105649.msg1323294#msg1323294 date=1352379880] When your 9-0 with 7 shutouts and have played 7 of the same teams that Silsbee has played, it's not arrogance. ;)  The two teams that Silsbee played different than WO-S played is Lumberton and Livingston. WO-S played Jasper and Central. [/quote] Look [u][b]Wonderbread[/b][/u]!!! I did not say the actual Mustangs were arrogant.. I said some not all of the fans arrogance is astounding. [/quote] Good one  ;D  You must be old school to remember Wonderbread. I wasn't necessarily directing that at you or anyone in particular, just stating that us 'Stang fans that have been following WO-S football know what to expect and the 79% winning ratio that spans over 35 years gives us fans the right to make comments like that and it not be considered arrogance. If by some chance Silsbee manages to pull this one out, I'll be back for my crow, don't take it personal.
  4. When your 9-0 with 7 shutouts and have played 7 of the same teams that Silsbee has played, it's not arrogance. ;)  The two teams that Silsbee played different than WO-S played is Lumberton and Livingston. WO-S played Jasper and Central.
  5. Some of these Silsbee fans holding on to dreams  8)
  6. [quote name="JohnSmith" post="1323104" timestamp="1352335023"] [quote author=Wonderboy link=topic=105898.msg1323073#msg1323073 date=1352331652] What no WO-S.  Their winning % is like 79%. WO-S is certainly closer to Houston than Lufkin is. I realize the article was counting total number of wins but percentage should count for something too  :'( [/quote]Lufkin is in a what they call a Houston area district the woodlands and conroe district. [/quote] Ahh I C, guess they didn't want WO-S raining on that parade anyway. Wasn't looking at it like that.
  7. What no WO-S.  Their winning % is like 79%. WO-S is certainly closer to Houston than Lufkin is. I realize the article was counting total number of wins but percentage should count for something too  :'(
  8. Where are all the people that were saying the WOS would not shutout BC?????
  9. Another 40+ game for WO-S.  40 something to 0.
  10. Great post, and it looks like you've included all the playoff games in those stats.  If you counted just regular season, what would the win/loss totals look like?
×
×
  • Create New...