LumRaiderFan

  Don't flatter yourself...it's not that difficult.

Fooled you twice, apparently!

Good deal...thank you for not clogging up the thread with your nonsense...please apply same logic to all other threads.

What news sources do you consider reliable?

So now we can only criticize an administration only if they INTENTIONALLY did something wrong...hmmmmm.   So it's all about intent and not results?

  Yep

These guys were probably used as examples of the success of the higher deportation numbers by being counted multiple times, that is, until they killed a Border Patrol Agent.   We need to secure the border...this problem didn't start with Obama and it isn't a Republican/Democrat issue.

    Speak of the devil.

[Hidden Content]

You will likely get no response or be told the post is dumb and not credible (without a reason, of course)...or, there may still be a chance that someone that disagrees will actually say why and even post a rebuttal...but I doubt it.   The growing trend seems to be trash the poster or the source, or both, and move on.

  Good thing the term doesn't fit to the Tea Party...except in the minds of low information lefties.

  I'm glad someone got this thread back on track.

[Hidden Content]

That is exactly what he is saying.

Impressive

Smitty has been posting on here a while...it's not his fault this administration provides so much low hanging fruit. If the posts are so absurd, post a rebuttal... If you can't, figure out why not.

I think if he hated Americans, he would want them to contract Ebola. Another dumb thead.

  She's waiting for the "correct" answer...I don't think you have it. 

Very informative thread.

[Hidden Content]

No derail...who are these "teabaggers" you are are talking to and what does this reference mean?

Answer the question.

ECO, where did the term teabagger originate?

Why do the moderators allow a thread that starts out with someone addressing teabaggers? It's not the first one...someone please do their job.

Exactly right!