Jump to content

VIDOR @ BRIDGE CITY Predictions


dustoff03

Recommended Posts

[quote name="PNGFan" post="1261894" timestamp="1346946629"]
[quote author=XDOG link=topic=102442.msg1261805#msg1261805 date=1346940801]
[quote author=PNG Fan link=topic=102442.msg1261778#msg1261778 date=1346937690]
Another weak preseason opponent for Vidor, the real test will be next week against Clear Brook.
[/quote]
I bet WOS is saying the same about yall :o
[/quote]

At least we're not afraid to play competition during non-district. But then again Vidor is used to playing Private 1A schools.
[/quote]

Silsbee is not a good team . PNG is in trouble
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="PNGFan" post="1261778" timestamp="1346937690"]
Another weak preseason opponent for Vidor, the real test will be next week against Clear Brook.
[/quote]

Lets see: last year perennial state power Texarkana Texas High was a "weak preseason opponent" for the Pirates and BC was "a good test". Now, though we play a series with BC (Jeff Mathews is from there), BC is part of the "weak preseason opponents" we play. I see PNG has scheduled some powerhouses this year. Get real. You'll get to test us out Oct. 26th in the Boneyard for our homecoming. But wait, we might get accused of playing a "weak regular season opponent."[move][size=36pt][b] GET SOME!!![/b][/size][/move]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="robanadana" post="1261927" timestamp="1346949606"]
[quote author=PNGFan link=topic=102442.msg1261778#msg1261778 date=1346937690]
Another weak preseason opponent for Vidor, the real test will be next week against Clear Brook.
[/quote]

Lets see: last year perennial state power Texarkana Texas High was a "weak preseason opponent" for the Pirates and BC was "a good test". Now, though we play a series with BC (Jeff Mathews is from there), BC is part of the "weak preseason opponents" we play. I see PNG has scheduled some powerhouses this year. Get real. You'll get to test us out Oct. 26th in the Boneyard for our homecoming. But wait, we might get accused of playing a "weak regular season opponent."[move][size=36pt][b] GET SOME!!![/b][/size][/move]
[/quote]

yeah, that "perennial state power"  went 6-5 and went out in the first round of the playoffs last year. ::)  LOL.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vidor's preseason schedule is simply not as strong as the Jefferson County 4A schools.  I am a huge Pirate Fan, but our non-district schedule has be historically weak. 

Some of stems from our Losing Tradition and I think a practice of trying to schedule some "winable" non-district foes. 

But of late, some of comes from an inability to get opponents who will play us.  I am not trying to be a martyr here.  I just think schools have traditional opponents and even when those match-ups change through the years, other programs do not have much of an incentive to schedule  Vidor.  Historically, it was a game that you are supposed to win and there was big downside if Vidor pulls the upset.  Maybe if Vidor can build a playoff tradition, it will help motivate more schools to schedule Vidor in the future (but to be fair, going to the playoffs 2 out of 3 seasons is simply a possible start such a tradition).

A final factor that may limit Vidor's ability to schedule is it's unique offense.  It does not make sense for a team to scheme against a unique system for just 1 game.  I really do not know how much that affects coaches in there scheduling mindset.  I know it would factor in for me.

But I wish Vidor fans would not try to trash talk when people call our preseason schedule weak, because it is simply not as strong as some others. 

But none of that means that we can't win district this year.  8)  But it does make it hard to gauge just good we really are vs how weak are opponents happen to be.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="PNGFan" post="1261894" timestamp="1346946629"]
[quote author=XDOG link=topic=102442.msg1261805#msg1261805 date=1346940801]
[quote author=PNG Fan link=topic=102442.msg1261778#msg1261778 date=1346937690]
Another weak preseason opponent for Vidor, the real test will be next week against Clear Brook.
[/quote]
I bet WOS is saying the same about yall :o
[/quote]

At least we're not afraid to play competition during non-district. But then again Vidor is used to playing Private 1A schools.
[/quote] for some reason PNG dosent play newton in preseason anymore  ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a dog in this fight, but it doesn't matter who you face in pre district, it what it is. Vidor had a goodrun last year and made some noise. They are riding a high and that is great. The realsparks are gonna fly when district starts. It doesn't matter where we play (png) at the boneyard or the reservation. The only fear I have of playing at the boneyard is yalls scoreboard may quit in the last quarter as that has happened before.lol I expect a good clean game and may the beast team win. See y'all on the 26th
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="daddy23" post="1262113" timestamp="1346962427"]
Vidor's preseason schedule is simply not as strong as the Jefferson County 4A schools.  I am a huge Pirate Fan, but our non-district schedule has be historically weak. 

Some of stems from our Losing Tradition and I think a practice of trying to schedule some "winable" non-district foes. 

But of late, some of comes from an inability to get opponents who will play us.  I am not trying to be a martyr here.  I just think schools have traditional opponents and even when those match-ups change through the years, other programs do not have much of an incentive to schedule  Vidor.  Historically, it was a game that you are supposed to win and there was big downside if Vidor pulls the upset.  Maybe if Vidor can build a playoff tradition, it will help motivate more schools to schedule Vidor in the future (but to be fair, going to the playoffs 2 out of 3 seasons is simply a possible start such a tradition).

A final factor that may limit Vidor's ability to schedule is it's unique offense.  It does not make sense for a team to scheme against a unique system for just 1 game.  I really do not know how much that affects coaches in there scheduling mindset.  I know it would factor in for me.

But I wish Vidor fans would not try to trash talk when people call our preseason schedule weak, because it is simply not as strong as some others. 

But none of that means that we can't win district this year.  8)  But it does make it hard to gauge just good we really are vs how weak are opponents happen to be.
[/quote]

C'mon now daddy23, trash talkin' is what this board is all about. Besides, I have a lot of faith in ol' #23.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="daddy23" post="1262113" timestamp="1346962427"]
Vidor's preseason schedule is simply not as strong as the Jefferson County 4A schools.  I am a huge Pirate Fan, but our non-district schedule has be historically weak. 

Some of stems from our Losing Tradition and I think a practice of trying to schedule some "winable" non-district foes. 

But of late, some of comes from an inability to get opponents who will play us.  I am not trying to be a martyr here.  I just think schools have traditional opponents and even when those match-ups change through the years, other programs do not have much of an incentive to schedule  Vidor.  Historically, it was a game that you are supposed to win and there was big downside if Vidor pulls the upset.  Maybe if Vidor can build a playoff tradition, it will help motivate more schools to schedule Vidor in the future (but to be fair, going to the playoffs 2 out of 3 seasons is simply a possible start such a tradition).

A final factor that may limit Vidor's ability to schedule is it's unique offense.  It does not make sense for a team to scheme against a unique system for just 1 game.  I really do not know how much that affects coaches in there scheduling mindset.  I know it would factor in for me.

But I wish Vidor fans would not try to trash talk when people call our preseason schedule weak, because it is simply not as strong as some others. 

But none of that means that we can't win district this year.  8)  But it does make it hard to gauge just good we really are vs how weak are opponents happen to be.
[/quote]

Good post..+1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Blackbuc" post="1262820" timestamp="1347026926"]
It [b]might just be my head swelling[/b] but the closer it gets to kick-off time the more i think we are really going to put a woopin on BC. expect Vidor to score fast and frequent in this!!
[/quote]

Advil, Tylenol, and Aleeve along with cold compresses or ice are great ways to combat swelling.

(On a serious note good luck and safe travels to all tonite)

Rake1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...