Jump to content

Nederland D1 region 3


Recommended Posts

Nederland is the highest ranked team in D1 region 3, doesn't guaranty any victories, but it is nice to get the recognition for an outstanding season. Brenham, LaMarque and Manvel all in D2 with PNG and if the rankings pan out, which they rarely do, we could see the PNG vs Manvel, Brenham vs LaMarque matchups, that would be some good football. If Nederland could make it to the semi-finals they could see Lake Travis, but before then there are some really good games they would have to win against some really powerful teams. Good luck to Ozen, Vidor, PNG and Nederland in the bi-district round coming up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Second highest. You missed Angleton (10-0 and ranked #7) also I think it goes without saying that Pearland Dawson at 8-2 is worthy of a ranking. They dropped out because they lost their last two to Manvel and Lamarque (a couple of serious state title contenders).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="indnfan" post="1108665" timestamp="1320730011"]
[quote author=bobbymcgee link=topic=91135.msg1108645#msg1108645 date=1320726557]
I'm worried about Pearland Dawson in Round 3. That's my main concern right now
[/quote]
Your main concern should be round 1. Just ask Brenham fan. Take nuttn for granted!!! ;)
[/quote]

Yep!  Can't wait for the rematch....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="indnfan" post="1108665" timestamp="1320730011"]
[quote author=bobbymcgee link=topic=91135.msg1108645#msg1108645 date=1320726557]
I'm worried about Pearland Dawson in Round 3. That's my main concern right now
[/quote]
Your main concern should be round 1. Just ask Brenham fan. Take nuttn for granted!!! ;)
[/quote]You are right... With that said, KP won't know what hit them this time!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What get's me and we see it every year, is the looking past the first round.  There are going to be several, several teams that were predicted and expected to make it past the first round and lose.  These message boards are going to be on fire come Sunday. 8)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Angleton gets past Friendswood ( Van Meter won't go down without a fight ) and Montgomery gets to the 3rd round, that Angleton/Montgomery matchup should be a real good one. On paper, whoever wins that should get a shot at Pearland Dawson for the regional finals. That's if there's no upsets.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...