Jump to content

BC vs. Silsbee Predictions?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name="Boogy1000" post="873100" timestamp="1286901629"]
Silsbee is in trouble! BC is coming to play
[/quote]
You are right about BC coming to play......but saying it over and over and over and over again is saying something else. I think you are trying to say that the current Silsbee players have no heart.

I think they do.  They know BC is for real.



 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Kville_Kats" post="873083" timestamp="1286900287"]
[quote author=KFDM COOP link=topic=74181.msg873079#msg873079 date=1286900047]
I agree, what is Tiger05 thinking?
[/quote]


Tiger05 has obviously missed a few football knowledge classes.... ;)
[/quote]

I am sure that everbody in Kville should know about football knowledege classes  ::)  ::)

and you should Defiantly know about a blind squirrel finding a nut every once in a while......
well atleast yall have found some the last 2 years  :D  :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Tiger05" post="873305" timestamp="1286917880"]
[quote author=Kville_Kats link=topic=74181.msg873083#msg873083 date=1286900287]
[quote author=KFDM COOP link=topic=74181.msg873079#msg873079 date=1286900047]
I agree, what is Tiger05 thinking?
[/quote]


Tiger05 has obviously missed a few football knowledge classes.... ;)
[/quote]

I am sure that everbody in Kville should know about football knowledege classes  ::)  ::)

and you should Defiantly know about a blind squirrel finding a nut every once in a while......
well atleast yall have found some the last 2 years  :D  :D
[/quote]


Yep you right.. ;) We found out where they keep them...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="bckshep" post="873350" timestamp="1286921513"]
BC is for real.
i say BC 31 Silsbee 21
[/quote]


i dont understand, what makes bc "for real?" is it because they beat a bunch of sub par teams, some of which are pathetic? is it because they put 31 on kirbyville who is the only solid team theyve played to date and the only team with a winning record? or is it because they beat HJ and are 1-0 in district?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Boogy1000" post="873410" timestamp="1286928281"]
Silsbee just turns the ball over too much. They have 9 for the year in 6 games. Far far too many for a BC team with this talent
[/quote]

1.5 turnovers a game is not that many in high school football. Can they be a difference..sure...but its not a large number.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silsbee's biggest weekness the last few years has been stopping running qbs. This year we can't stop the run period. I'm thinking we need to go ahead and pull up some of the hosses from the JV squad. Picking BC by 10-14 but Silsbee has the ability to outscore them in a shootout. Hope they do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="SHSTIGER" post="873645" timestamp="1286940407"]
Silsbee's biggest weekness the last few years has been stopping running qbs. This year we can't stop the run period. I'm thinking we need to go ahead and pull up some of the hosses from the JV squad. Picking BC by 10-14 but Silsbee has the ability to outscore them in a shootout. Hope they do.
[/quote]

Some of the JV players have already been pulled up.  They were on the sideline last week.  I know one saw the field not sure about any others. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="872773" timestamp="1286851364"]
[quote author=SetxFootball link=topic=74181.msg872770#msg872770 date=1286850989]
[quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=74181.msg872759#msg872759 date=1286850592]
Orangefield is averaging 332 yards rushing a game, BC is averaging 247.
[/quote]

So how many passing are they averaging?? :D
[/quote]

BC is averaging 109 yards passing, Orangefield is averaging 3 yards passing. ;) ;D
[/quote]

that's what I thought  8)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="ST413" post="873653" timestamp="1286940865"]
[quote author=SHSTIGER link=topic=74181.msg873645#msg873645 date=1286940407]
Silsbee's biggest weekness the last few years has been stopping running qbs. This year we can't stop the run period. I'm thinking we need to go ahead and pull up some of the hosses from the JV squad. Picking BC by 10-14 but Silsbee has the ability to outscore them in a shootout. Hope they do.
[/quote]

Some of the JV players have already been pulled up.  They were on the sideline last week.  I know one saw the field not sure about any others. 
[/quote]

Thanks. Guess that was why some of the 9th graders were on the JV squad last week. We also have had the nasty habit of playing up and down to competition the last several years. No way BC blows us out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
    • The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel.  I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...