Jump to content

nederland vs brehnam

ForeverADog

By ForeverADog
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

EagleAG03

EagleAG03

Posted
Posted
Definitely beatable. They are going to remind you of the team Livingston had last year when they made their run to the regional tourney, matter of fact that's who they beat to get their.

Their defense can be suffocating sometimes and can completely dismantle you offensively when they are playing their defense with energy and passion. They play a 1-2-2 and will extend it out to half court sometimes when they want to push the action or feel like they can make a run. they will run that 1-2-2 3/4 court most of the time and are real aggressive in trapping and will extend it to the full court some. They will fall back and play it in the half court the rest of the time.

They are long and athletic and essentially play 5 guards. They start a 6'7 kid but he doesn't play a ton.

Offensively, they run basic motion and like to dribble drive you a lot with Hull (pg) uptop with Hall and Reese sitting in the corners to light you up. That's if Hull can't get to the rack which he can some. They are pretty basic vs a zone but are effective. They can shoot when they are hot but if they aren't hitting they can become an average team.

Hull - 6'2 ish PG. Handles the ball mostly and can drain the 3 some. Likes to try and drive the lane a little and see if he can get in the paint.

Hall - 6'0 ish Guard. To me is the heart and soul. I think if you take that guy off the team they aren't the same team. Can shoot the three ball and will light you up if left open.

Breedlove - 6'0 ish Guard. Solid player and is active around the glass and rebounding. Can knock down an occasional 3 if left open. I might have this kid's name messed up with the big kid but you will know who he is because he's bowlegged.

Reese - 6'3 ish Guard. Freak of an athlete and can move. Signed with Utah to play football. Can go and will attack the rim hard in transition. Not the greatest ball handler but adequate. If you let him get started he can be hard to stop.

Big Kid 6'7 ish post. Like I said earlier I think I'm getting this kid and the breedlove kid mixed up but I can't think of their names. Not a great athlete, can cause problems on the glass because of his height. Not going to take the ball on the block and make a great move on you. He will come out fairly quick and will be replaced with Colvin.

Colvin 6'1 ish Guard. Will come off the bench and is pretty good. I honestly think the only reason this kid doesn't start is because they want to start a big kid. Will light you up and is very active around the rim.

Nederland can definitely beat them but they will have to play very well because Brenham is no pushover. They will flat out get after you on defense and you have to have some ball handlers to control the offense. They will trap you in the corners and force you to move the ball quickly or they will turn you over.

Very rarely will you see them run because their coach will slow themselves down. They will run but if he has a small lead or is down some he will make them slow down to get a good shot. As long as the action is moving though he will let them run some.

Forney will definitely be a big advantage vs their zone and because of that their big kid will have to play more, which I think is good for Nederland.

That's just my two cents and I might think of some more things later on. Good Luck Nederland.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • tvc184
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
    • Mr. Buddy Garrity
      Road to Omaha

      By Mr. Buddy Garrity · Posted

      See why I don't trust my Hogs?
    • Sports10
      Orangefield vs. Franklin - Post Updates/Scores here! SERIES TIED 1-1

      By Sports10 · Posted

      Come on dude, don’t take anything away from the kids on the field. If you want to talk uncharacteristic, we made what 3 or 4 errors in game one. Y’all had 2 EARNED runs.  Defense is normally our strong suit. Your ace didn’t strike out a single one of our kids. Like I said also, you did not out hit us in game 1. Hell you barley out hit us in game 2. We had all the uncharacteristic walks. Josh pitched a hell of a game is what made that game what it was.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...