Jump to content

OBAMA or McCAIN or PALIN or BIDEN


Guest WeedBegone

Politics aside (LOL) Which of these would the best to coach your HS football team?  

199 members have voted

  1. 1. Politics aside (LOL) Which of these would the best to coach your HS football team?

    • Obama
      31
    • McCain
      68
    • Palin
      91
    • Biden
      9


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't think that Obama can give a mean coach's game face.  Players won't respond in a crutial part of the game.  McCain just flat out look like he is about to lie.  He will say 'We going for it on 4th and 2.'  They players won't take him serious.  They'll just be standing there looking at him, waiting on him to say... 'Man, you know I'm just pulling your chain' (not in those words either).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest WeedBegone

I agree with SETXGAL that Palin may be the only one who know the game.  I like her spunk.  No doubt she would go with a tough schedule. The only problem is that football might conflict with MOOSE Hunting.

Now Biden--he would have to use somebody elses play book--- ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote for "None of The Above" (Richard Pryor....Brewster's Millions)

I'd take Palin just because I'd like to see her in some coaching shorts.  ;)

I like your thinking. I wouldn't vote for any of them, because they're all politicians. Which means, they'd all lie more than a leisure suit on a pimp! (and one would lie more than the others).....

.....what color shorts? ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It definitely wouldn't be Obama, he would feel the need to SPREAD the DANG PLAYING TIME AROUND... we wouldn't have our best players on the field.  So, the kids who get the job done under the lights would have to sit in order to let little johnny get his plays in even though little johnny don't come to practice and when he does he'd be better off playing cup ball under the practice stands.  I'm still undecided on who I'm voting for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...