Jump to content

Top Offensive Team in 21-AAA?

ALLABOUTSTATE4BC09
 Share

Recommended Posts

Master T

Master T

Posted
Posted

I know WO-S still has Depauldrick brother (forgot his name). But who else will be a factor on their offense. Silsbee by far from 2-A-Day look real good with their Receiver and has a top notch QB in their presence (linemen still a ???). HJ even though they bring all their starter I really don't know how they'll do. BC can't see them turning things around in just one season (experience but not talent wise). OF don't hear too much about them I can't comment on them. HF has those trick plays that I like, that what makes them the way they are but how good would they be if they didn't have such trick plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gasilla

Gasilla

Posted
Posted

I know WO-S still has Depauldrick brother (forgot his name). But who else will be a factor on their offense. Silsbee by far from 2-A-Day look real good with their Receiver and has a top notch QB in their presence (linemen still a ???). HJ even though they bring all their starter I really don't know how they'll do. BC can't see them turning things around in just one season (experience but not talent wise). OF don't hear too much about them I can't comment on them. HF has those trick plays that I like, that what makes them the way they are but how good would they be if they didn't have such trick plays.

Well... WOS has returning QB- Hypolite, RB- Garrett, WR/RB- Haynes, WR- Gloston, WR- Franks, OL- Arnold, OL- Provost, OL- Roberts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Dr.J

Guest Dr.J

Posted
Posted

hj has an awesome offense...they have all their RB'S and recievers back from last year.....trey burrell(RB) blake venable(QB)jacoby turner(RB) garrett smith(WR) james morrison(WR) and several more skill guys and they picked up a few new linemen who are looking amazing....they will surprise alot of people this year and i cant wait to see them in action!!!! ;D ;D ;D :o :o :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fisherking

fisherking

Posted
Posted

I know WO-S still has Depauldrick brother (forgot his name). But who else will be a factor on their offense. Silsbee by far from 2-A-Day look real good with their Receiver and has a top notch QB in their presence (linemen still a ???). HJ even though they bring all their starter I really don't know how they'll do. BC can't see them turning things around in just one season (experience but not talent wise). OF don't hear too much about them I can't comment on them. HF has those trick plays that I like, that what makes them the way they are but how good would they be if they didn't have such trick plays.

Trick plays? I am curious what you are referring to? If there was a power football team that says "here we come stop us it is HF." I saw them against BC last year but heard they were tough to stop, I saw no trick plays?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fisherking

fisherking

Posted
Posted

Do you remember the play when second half started and H-F returned a kickoff return for a Touchdown??

Im not sayin the smoke messed B.C. up lol

I think that was a clasic trick play though 8)

Yeah I did, the timing was perfect and very smokey.LOL But I thought that was BC smoke?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jr1979

jr1979

Posted
Posted

I know WO-S still has Depauldrick brother (forgot his name). But who else will be a factor on their offense. Silsbee by far from 2-A-Day look real good with their Receiver and has a top notch QB in their presence (linemen still a ???). HJ even though they bring all their starter I really don't know how they'll do. BC can't see them turning things around in just one season (experience but not talent wise). OF don't hear too much about them I can't comment on them. HF has those trick plays that I like, that what makes them the way they are but how good would they be if they didn't have such trick plays.

Well... WOS has returning QB- Hypolite, RB- Garrett, WR/RB- Haynes, WR- Gloston, WR- Franks, OL- Arnold, OL- Provost, OL- Roberts.

Provost has actually moved to TE and is doing really well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stangchain

stangchain

Posted
Posted

I know WO-S still has Depauldrick brother (forgot his name). But who else will be a factor on their offense. Silsbee by far from 2-A-Day look real good with their Receiver and has a top notch QB in their presence (linemen still a ???). HJ even though they bring all their starter I really don't know how they'll do. BC can't see them turning things around in just one season (experience but not talent wise). OF don't hear too much about them I can't comment on them. HF has those trick plays that I like, that what makes them the way they are but how good would they be if they didn't have such trick plays.

Well... WOS has returning QB- Hypolite, RB- Garrett, WR/RB- Haynes, WR- Gloston, WR- Franks, OL- Arnold, OL- Provost, OL- Roberts.

Provost has actually moved to TE and is doing really well.

I'm shocked to hear WOS will have a TE.  They aren't known much for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jr1979

jr1979

Posted
Posted

I know WO-S still has Depauldrick brother (forgot his name). But who else will be a factor on their offense. Silsbee by far from 2-A-Day look real good with their Receiver and has a top notch QB in their presence (linemen still a ???). HJ even though they bring all their starter I really don't know how they'll do. BC can't see them turning things around in just one season (experience but not talent wise). OF don't hear too much about them I can't comment on them. HF has those trick plays that I like, that what makes them the way they are but how good would they be if they didn't have such trick plays.

Well... WOS has returning QB- Hypolite, RB- Garrett, WR/RB- Haynes, WR- Gloston, WR- Franks, OL- Arnold, OL- Provost, OL- Roberts.

Provost has actually moved to TE and is doing really well.

I'm shocked to hear WOS will have a TE.  They aren't known much for that.

Yes, I know. There will be a few new wrinkles added this year. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Reagan
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By Reagan · Posted

      BOOM!!
    • Mr. Buddy Garrity
      Road to Omaha

      By Mr. Buddy Garrity · Posted

      We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • tvc184
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...