Reagan Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 50 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: You are ignoring a lot of facts to try and be right. Excellent definition of all commie-libs! Quote
tvc184 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 9 hours ago, little red said: And. One has nothing to do with the other. Then the point went over your head. Mat said that it’s not fair to judge a whole program due to a couple of agents. In agreement I noted that we shouldn’t criticize the medical profession There are about 1 million doctors according to google and about 900,000 law enforcement officers so roughly the same. So almost a million law enforcement officers kill about 1,300 (most of which aren’t really controversial) and about a million doctors kill as much as 400,000 who weren’t causing the circumstances by violating the law. Then when we narrow it to ICE agents it’s a couple of people. Are that directly related? No but to not see the comparison is to ignore Mat’s comment that I was referring to. It’s hard to believe that you can’t seen the comparison or analogy when referring to his comment. Quote
tvc184 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 9 hours ago, little red said: What was self defense? The agents’ use of force. Quote
tvc184 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 9 hours ago, little red said: So, he had to be executed because they thought he was running for some reason. Call the cops, they knew where he lived. The smoke screens are always there. Maybe 15 years ago, there was a case of police officers with a valid warrant went into a guy’s home looking for marijuana. After entry was made the suspect went for a gun that was shot and killed. The narrative in some media accounts and the usual anti police crowd was that the resident was killed for selling marijuana. How ludicrous can they be? Apparently quite a lot. The guy wasn’t killed because he possessed marijuana. He was killed because he went for a gun to shoot the police. How many police shootings start off as a minor traffic offense, but the driver, unbeknownst to the officer, has just committed a major crime somewhere and is getting away or perhaps it’s committing a felony at that moment in the car? In such cases the drivers weren’t shot because they were speeding or had an expired license plate. It’s like the same in some of these cases. The media makes a big deal of, “He wasn’t the target of the investigation!”. What has that got to do with the use of force? That’s a trick question. The answer is absolutely nothing. If the officers are wrong, then I hope they get indicted. It needs to come from the facts of the situation and not whether he was the target or simply because he was fleeing. The smoke screens are a targeted response to keep from getting at the facts. baddog 1 Quote
baddog Posted 29 minutes ago Report Posted 29 minutes ago This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.