Jump to content

Top 50 All Time Winning Percentages All Classifications


Recommended Posts

Some of these numbers differ slightly from other posted rankings but these are the numbers I have calculated from my own research. The records of all 1004 active teams 1A through 5A on the UIL roster for 2005 were included in compiling this list.

Top 50 Highest All-Time Winning Percentages among active 11-man UIL teams (no minimum games played)

(includes games thru 2005 season--ties are counted as one half of a win)

1. 24-3A West Orange-Stark (258-71-3) 78.16%

2. 3-5A Odessa Permian (432-119-12) 77.80%

3. 22-4A Houston Yates (347-100-12) 76.91%

4. 1-4A El Paso Chapin (35-11-0) 76.09%

5. 16-5A Austin Westlake (321-103-7) 75.29%

6. 9-5A Dallas Carter (333-107-9) 75.17%

7. 5-5A Southlake Carroll (382-126-8 ) 74.81%

8. 1-5A El Paso Franklin (95-32-0) 74.80%

9. 26-4A Pflugerville Connally (71-25-0) 73.96%

10. 11-4A Highland Park (673-238-27) 73.19%

11. 7-5A Arlington Lamar (287-105-6) 72.86%

12. 25-4A Austin Reagan (329-126-11) 71.78%

13. 27-2A Universal City Randolph (327-128-13) 71.26%

14. 27-5A San Antonio Clark (219-91-5) 70.32%

15. 26-5A Converse Judson (373-155-10) 70.26%

16. 13-5A Killeen Harker Heights (48-21-0) 69.57%

17. 4-5A Mansfield Summit (32-14-0) 69.57%

18. 2-5A Amarillo (686-299-22) 69.22%

19. 22-1A Groveton (580-250-34) 69.10%

20. 8-5A Plano (679-293-47) 68.94%

21. 23-4A La Marque (473-212-17) 68.59%

22. 20-5A Fort Bend Hightower (48-22-0) 68.57%

23. 13-5A Temple (667-292-52) 68.55%

24. 29-2A Refugio (553-252-31) 68.00%

25. 6-5A Euless Trinity (291-138-6) 67.59%

26. 12-2A Crawford (475-222-29) 67.42%

27. 20-2A Garrison (438-210-13) 67.25%

28. 29-3A Hondo (607-288-31) 67.22%

29. 13-2A Celina (464-222-18 ) 67.19%

30. 14-5A The Woodlands (210-101-7) 67.14%

31. 13-5A Waco Cons. (153-76-2) 66.67%

32. 16-4A Brownwood (621-309-29) 66.27%

33. 32-5A Harlingen (551-272-37) 66.22%

34. 8-5A Plano West (41-21-0) 66.13%

35. 2-3A Littlefield (533-272-27) 65.69%

36. 28-4A Medina Valley (319-165-7) 65.68%

37. 24-4A El Campo (568-288-38 ) 65.66%

38. 26-5A San Antonio Churchill (287-148-11) 65.58%

39. 3-2A Ballinger (571-293-29) 65.57%

40. 6-1A Seagraves (464-241-13) 65.53%

41. 8-5A Lewisville (502-260-25) 65.37%

42. 16-3A White Oak (480-250-26) 65.21%

43. 6-3A Pilot Point (484-251-31) 65.21%

44. 14-4A Corsicana (629-327-43) 65.12%

45. 26-5A San Antonio Madison (205-109-4) 65.09%

46. 14-5A Lufkin (590-308-37) 65.08%

47. 23-3A Barbers Hill (499-262-27) 65.04%

48. 20-5A Fort Bend Willowridge (193-103-4) 65.00%

49. 22-2A Mart (609-320-42) 64.88%

50. 8-5A Plano East (173-93-4) 64.81%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grad' date=' you have to agree![/quote']

And where did someone say that I disagreed? I'll scream from the highest mountain that WO-S is one of the top teams in the state. When I tell someone here in the Houston area that knows anything about football that I graduated from WO-S, eyes grow wide and the neck straightens up.

It is really great work by WOS87, but it only confirms what we all already knew.

P.S. Could you tell us when the list will be updated to reflect the new district affiliations of those on the list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

When I tell someone here in the Houston area that knows anything about football that I graduated from WO-S, eyes grow wide and the neck straightens up.

Thats a sign that they are about to pass out from standing there for hours listening to how great ya'll were in years past.....................Its like at a wedding when the groomsman pass out becasue they lock their legs from standing there so long......same reaction you get. Its not AWWWW your experiencing its ;omg AWWWW please will you stop talking so I can leave.............................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not really a relative comparison, actually. Some of those teams haven't played a quarter of the games that some of the others have. WOS has almost 200 less games than MOJO. Harker Heights has only played 60 games, where there are teams on there that have played almost 900. The percentages are going to be different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not intending this as a bash against any of those teams. WOS' record is very impressive, I am not contesting that. I'm just pointing out that because these are averages that are posted, that the teams with less games total have an advantage because it takes less wins to acheive a higher average. I was suggesting do averages for 500 games and above played for example or 500 games and under.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest GoStangs

the teams with less games total have an advantage because it takes less wins to acheive a higher average.

Or, maybe they're at a disadvantage, since each loss has more of an impact on their percentage than teams with a lot of games...

I think the point you're making is that a more accurate picture of a team's winning percentage is by comparing like-amount of games. That's a valid argument... To me, it's very impressive for WOS to be at the top of the list, but it will be more impressive if they can remain there for a long period of time. There was a lot of work put into getting them where they are, and they beat a bunch of solid teams along the way; hopefully, they can stay there for a long while. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,985
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    SVD Beaumont
    Newest Member
    SVD Beaumont
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Where were the 8 Omaha teams in D1's preseason top 25 poll... 2. Florida 8. A&M 9. Tennessee 13. N.C.State 14. Virginia 15. North Carolina Kentucky - unranked Florida State - unranked
    • That TDS is really flaring. Now do Biden. You have way, way, way more material. And keep that bitter "you are better than me" jealousy tone you have with Trump. You know Biden, the one you want everyone to vote for instead of Trump. Somehow you didn't acknowledge my pleas for you to die a painful death. I was quite certain that is how you would have interpreted my previous post. I guess when your focus is Trump 24/7, nothing else matters.
    • I have a better one. The point that nobody wants to acknowledge is that Dems are crossing over to vote Trump in the primaries and in the general so he will win the presidency. That way Trump will get the blame when the Dems implement their sinister plan to deport all of the minorities in the country. They have already laid the groundwork...convincing everyone that Trump and Republicans are racist (without providing any proof). Then it will be just a matter of time to execute their White supremacy plan of the great purge of the dirty, unwashed, heathen, non-Whites that roam freely in this country. I think my theory is more viable than your theory. Maybe we can get some other ridiculous scenarios so we can start a poll.
    • But that’s what Trump’s fanboys don’t understand.  When he talked about sexually assaulting women, y’all laughed it off as “locker room talk.”  When it was proven that he raped E. Jean Carroll, you cried that it was all an injustice… a lie. Even though he’d already confessed to doing the same thing to other women.  John McCain has suffered and sacrificed more for his country than practically anybody, except possible gold star families… and Trump called him a loser or something to that effect. “Oh, it was a joke that no one was supposed to take seriously.” But when Trump, after disrespecting the sacrifices of one of our most valiant, y’all are like “just because Trump didn’t go to Omaha Beach doesn’t mean he isn’t pro military!” Really? All you have to do is listen to what he said about McCain’s service. Not McCain as an opponent, not McCain’s political views… about the fact that the man was tortured, probably raped, and who knows what all else for over five years for swearing an oath and putting on the uniform.  But all of y’all supposedly “pro military” people just laughed along with Trump. “Good one, Sir! Maverick my new-hind! Filthy Rino!”  I don’t understand how the same people (y’all) who probably always say “thank you for your service” to any veteran still support a guy who craps on the ones who suffered the most on our behalf.  It’s baffling. 
    • Wow. Do you actually believe your little scenario has any chance of alleviating you of your moral immaturity? Deflection at it's best...or worse. You seem to be a sad case. If you died today, I would be remiss if not attributing your cause of death to severe TDS, and of course, Covid. Look at that. I just made a joke about your death. You did not get offended. Nobody was offended. Not one person will accuse me of being hateful towards fellow human beings. But yet, you hate Trump because he made a similar crude comment about McCain. You tried to attribute that comment as evidence Trump hates the military. What grade level of schoolchildren do you think is laughing at you for that "less that adolescent" (hint, hint) comment. You used one crude comment in an attempt to justify your TDS. Now, when called on it, you try to deflect the whole topic. You are certainly not having any fun with this, but you sure are providing entertainment for the board. It's a shame you can't join in on the fun. I think even Big Girl might be to the point of giggling at the shamelessness you are exhibiting.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...