Jump to content

*KINGWOOD INSPERITY*/Post updates here


Recommended Posts

Here are the schedule of games for today involving our coverage area teams:

9:00 am Summer Creek vs. Houston Heights

10:30 am Atascocita vs. Eastern Hills

1:30 pm Kingwood vs. Nimitz

3:00 pm Yates/Del Valle loser vs. Summer Creek/Houston Heights loser

3:00 pm Yates/Del Valle winner vs. Summer Creek/Houston Heights winner

6:00 pm Cy Springs/Seven Lakes loser vs. Atascocita/Eastern Hills loser

6:00 pm Cy Springs/Seven Lakes winner vs. Atascocita/Eastern Hills winner

7:30 pm Kingwood/Nimitz loser vs. Lamar/Cy Woods loser

7:30 pm Kingwood/Nimitz winner vs. Lamar/Cy Woods winner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday's results courtesy of HoopInsider

Thursday, Dec 27
4A #8 Yates 84, Del Valle 76 OT
Houston Heights 68, Summer Creek 52
Cy Springs 60, Seven Lakes 55
Atascocita 61, Eastern Hills 52
6A #19 Cy Falls 64, Austin Anderson 27
Cy Fair 78, The Woodlands 77
Austin Bowie 58, Mansfield Legacy 47
Judson 92, Temple 64
Kingwood 51, Nimitz 35
Lamar 71, Cy Woods 44
Summer Creek 70, Del Valle 67
4A #8 Yates 72, Houston Heights 54
The Woodlands 57, Austin Anderson 50
Cy Falls 75, Cy Fair 70
Seven Lakes 50, Eastern Hill 45
Atascocita 70, Cy Springs 48
Nimitz 57, Cy Woods 44
Lamar 60, Kingwood 41

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,988
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CougarCrazy124
    Newest Member
    CougarCrazy124
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Baytown Lee for a qb I heard… 
    • Shall not be infringed was not even an issue in this case.  The Supreme Court allowed and in fact didn’t even debate the ban on machine guns as being lawful.   The Supreme Court only looked at the law passed by Congress, accepted it as law and looked to see if bump stocks fit the legal definition as passed by Congress and signed by the president.  The easy answer was no, it did not and the ATF was making up their own definition which is unconstitutional.  In another comment you stated that bump stocks serve “no valuable purpose”. I agree but do we throw out the Constitution? We don’t need neo nazis  or klan members rhetoric either but are willing to pick and choose who gets free speech? I support the Supreme Court decision on an item that I don’t want even if you gave me one. I support it because it follows statutory law and the Constitution.  Do you suggest that the Supreme Court ignore the Constitution for political or dislike purposes? 
    • How would cracking down on crime prevented have what happened in Vegas?   The law of the land is no automatic weapons. If you get caught with a switch on your Glock, it’s a problem.  But you can legally modify your AR to get the same results? It’s a loophole that shouldn’t be there legally, and gun owners should boycott.    I love my AR. I believe everybody should get one. But there’s a big difference between a 30 round mag that’s fired semi-automatically, with at least the possibility of aiming at particular targets…. And a bump stop equipped AR that quite simply can’t be aimed. When the left argues that an AR serves no purpose, I disagree. But when some 2A nut is arguing that their fully automatic AR (by why of a bumpstock which renders the weapon useless in regards to accurate fire) is legal, I have to disagree, too.   
    • It will depend on how many kids move to Crosby this year. Last year they lost 2.
    • The fried brains will vote for him, and a few of them are on here.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...