Jump to content

bill o reily


Big girl

Recommended Posts

Could you please point me toward the most recent "blanket statement" about liberals tthat somebody made on this board?


I will help you out here:

http://setxsports.com/ip/index.php?/forum/101-setx-political-arena/

Just click on any thread with several replies and there is a good chance you will find one. Or just look for a Smitty reference to "low information voters." Pretty blanket statement IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I understand now. There should be a rule that nobody can refer to low information voters or make any generalizations about them or liberals. At the same time, it will be perfectly acceptable to have threads with titles like " Why Do Teabaggers Hate America" There certainly are no assumptions or generalizations in that one. Or perhaps an even simpler method is: No criticism can be construed as objective unless it is promulgated by someone who leans to the left. I think this is how "some" define fairness. Considering the number of "righties" on this board, I think you have a long and arduous road ahead of you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill o Reilly is actually pretty damn smart, he just adapts to his audience for the $$$ (can't blame him)

Go check out his work with Jon Stewart. His character on fox and what he truly believes don't always line up

 

 

I would be curious as to why Big Girl does not like him.....

 

I agree ECO.....Damn smart guy, and I think for the most part he is real about what he believes.

 

He also is not a big basher of Obama.....I have seen him take up for Obama on some issues

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I understand now. There should be a rule that nobody can refer to low information voters or make any generalizations about them or liberals. At the same time, it will be perfectly acceptable to have threads with titles like " Why Do Teabaggers Hate America" There certainly are no assumptions or generalizations in that one. Or perhaps an even simpler method is: No criticism can be construed as objective unless it is promulgated by someone who leans to the left. I think this is how "some" define fairness. Considering the number of "righties" on this board, I think you have a long and arduous road ahead of you.

Come on, Steve, connecting the dots for some is a little out of reach!     :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor Stevenash don't like when generalizations are made about him or his fellow teabaggers

WAHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHH

Do I need to call the wambulance to come get you stevey boy?

[attachment=104:image.jpg]

I think I understand now. There should be a rule that nobody can refer to low information voters or make any generalizations about them or liberals. At the same time, it will be perfectly acceptable to have threads with titles like " Why Do Teabaggers Hate America" There certainly are no assumptions or generalizations in that one. Or perhaps an even simpler method is: No criticism can be construed as objective unless it is promulgated by someone who leans to the left. I think this is how "some" define fairness. Considering the number of "righties" on this board, I think you have a long and arduous road ahead of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...