Jump to content

bill o reily

Big girl

By Big girl
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted

Could you please point me toward the most recent "blanket statement" about liberals tthat somebody made on this board?


I will help you out here:

http://setxsports.com/ip/index.php?/forum/101-setx-political-arena/

Just click on any thread with several replies and there is a good chance you will find one. Or just look for a Smitty reference to "low information voters." Pretty blanket statement IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted
I think I understand now. There should be a rule that nobody can refer to low information voters or make any generalizations about them or liberals. At the same time, it will be perfectly acceptable to have threads with titles like " Why Do Teabaggers Hate America" There certainly are no assumptions or generalizations in that one. Or perhaps an even simpler method is: No criticism can be construed as objective unless it is promulgated by someone who leans to the left. I think this is how "some" define fairness. Considering the number of "righties" on this board, I think you have a long and arduous road ahead of you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
Posted

Bill o Reilly is actually pretty damn smart, he just adapts to his audience for the $$$ (can't blame him)

Go check out his work with Jon Stewart. His character on fox and what he truly believes don't always line up

 

 

I would be curious as to why Big Girl does not like him.....

 

I agree ECO.....Damn smart guy, and I think for the most part he is real about what he believes.

 

He also is not a big basher of Obama.....I have seen him take up for Obama on some issues

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smitty

smitty

Posted
Posted

I think I understand now. There should be a rule that nobody can refer to low information voters or make any generalizations about them or liberals. At the same time, it will be perfectly acceptable to have threads with titles like " Why Do Teabaggers Hate America" There certainly are no assumptions or generalizations in that one. Or perhaps an even simpler method is: No criticism can be construed as objective unless it is promulgated by someone who leans to the left. I think this is how "some" define fairness. Considering the number of "righties" on this board, I think you have a long and arduous road ahead of you.

Come on, Steve, connecting the dots for some is a little out of reach!     :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EnlightenedChosenOne

EnlightenedChosenOne

Posted
Posted
Poor Stevenash don't like when generalizations are made about him or his fellow teabaggers

WAHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHH

Do I need to call the wambulance to come get you stevey boy?

[attachment=104:image.jpg]

I think I understand now. There should be a rule that nobody can refer to low information voters or make any generalizations about them or liberals. At the same time, it will be perfectly acceptable to have threads with titles like " Why Do Teabaggers Hate America" There certainly are no assumptions or generalizations in that one. Or perhaps an even simpler method is: No criticism can be construed as objective unless it is promulgated by someone who leans to the left. I think this is how "some" define fairness. Considering the number of "righties" on this board, I think you have a long and arduous road ahead of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
    • 5GallonBucket
      2024 Astros

      By 5GallonBucket · Posted

      Abreu is back at 1st. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
    • Reagan
      Fake Pandemic Scam Part 2?!

      By Reagan · Posted

      New Human “Vaccines” Are Already Developed and Stockpiled for a Pandemic Flu That Doesn’t Even Exist Yet!  New vaccines for pandemic bird flu have already been developed and stockpiled by the U.S. government. These new vaccines were not designed for birds and other animals, where the current strain of bird flu is spreading. Even though this strain of bird flu has not even been transmitted from human-to-human, there is already a new supply of H5N1 vaccines and other mRNA “bird flu” vaccines in the works. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...