Jump to content

Top 09's


Recommended Posts

Guest K-911

You are right about the scouts calling the coaches. But I do believe that they might use message boards to get sombody's name to begin with. Most coaches in this area do not promote their players. Most of these kids that get noticed have to promote themselves. With budgets getting tighter for colleges it is not out of the realm of possibility that some "scouts" could get names of potential players from the internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The issue is not whether scouts use this message board, its whether or not they use message boards in general...and without a doubt, they do...need I supply a link?

As for the issue of whether or not scouts use this message board....They do also...I personally know of a few that read and even post....Do they take this stuff to be the gospel?...Heck no...But no doubt it helps them get an idea of who to look for...Believe it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think oldcoach is right in some ways. He is trying to let Mrs. Cleaver know that she can't ask "who is the best" and then reply two posts later that Beaver is one to keep an eye on and this all the sudden makes him a prospect.

I have noticed many times that it actually Beaver that is posting and telling us he is amoung the elite of the class of 09. (He would probably use the name BC67 or something like that.)

The scouts that would use information from any of these websites would know exactly whose info they can count on such as MIF and jdawg along with others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how bout zack peevey I heard he is doing well at OF but i think he has too much talent to be playing at that school

mj23, you and your classmate db21 have tooted your own horn enough

now you have disrespected another school

you ignored earlier advice to bow out, but you keep on keepin on

you evidently missed the edition of This Week in Battlin' Bear Baseball that recommends that all LCM players please stay off of all message boards

it has brought us (and other teams) some problems in the past

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to know why some people think that scouts would not use message boards for information. Maybe if they would sit back and think of all the High Schools in the USA and the number of players there is maybe it will start to sink in. There are alot of good players that never get there name out there, Alot because of there parents and/or coaches do not know how are do not have time. And there is not near enough collage or indepndent scouts to cover every high school in Texas. The 08's and 09's are very important to find so you can watch them develop over 3-4 years. It is also very easy to do this in the Houston and Dallas area but extremly hard in the smaller towns that do produce some very good talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to know why some people think that scouts would not use message boards for information. Maybe if they would sit back and think of all the High Schools in the USA and the number of players there is maybe it will start to sink in. There are alot of good players that never get there name out there' date=' Alot because of there parents and/or coaches do not know how are do not have time. And there is not near enough collage or indepndent scouts to cover every high school in Texas. The 08's and 09's are very important to find so you can watch them develop over 3-4 years. It is also very easy to do this in the Houston and Dallas area but extremly hard in the smaller towns that do produce some very good talent.[/quote']

I think the point that was being made earlier is that the majority of posts, especially in this thread for instance are made by players or their parents to get the players name out there for a scout. Surely a scout would be watching line scores and stats in the newspapers and even on these websites for more information. A well informed scout is going to know that Johnny hitting a triple against PNG'a Harwell holds a little more clout than Johnny hitting a triple against Central. Or, that a triple in game 5 of a tournament with no pitching left is a little less impressive than one hit in district play against a top team's ace. Little Johnny and his parents don't need to worry so much, if the talent is there, he will get noticed-his play will speak for itself. Kids get "discovered" all of the time when scouts are at games watching big name players and others on the team (or even on the opposing team) step up and play well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's about 37 Junior Colleges and maybe 18 Div 1 programs in Texas. So when you put the pen to it 55 x 9 positions = 495 spots open. Stats tell you that 1 out of 10 high school players go to the next level.

Few players will be overlooked; I don’t care if you’re playing at Westbrook or High Island.

Most coaches work very hard trying to find a spot for their kids. Have you ever been put down as a reference for someone getting a job or been asked by a very close friend who would you recommend for .i.e. mechanic, doctor or attorney?

High School coaches have one shot with a college coach, they can’t afford to lose any creditability they may have for making the wrong decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but whats sad is when a coach markets or advertises a player more just because they like them better on a personal level...And.....on the other hand, some players that are less liked by the coach on a personal level, do not get showcased as much....even though they may be a better ballplayer..........

now granted a good coach would not do that, but don' t think for one second it doesnt happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Send the college scouts game videos and let them decide for themselves who they like.

Unedited video does not lie and it does not play favorites.

Tell them what you think about each of your kids and let them pick the ones they like from your team.

College coaches are busy. It is their season right now too. A game tape of a ball player that can't afford college can change a kids life.

Colleges have even signed kids from our opponents that looked good on these game tapes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest K-911

College coaches are busy. It is their season right now too. A game tape of a ball player that can't afford college can change a kids life.

I agree about sending out the video. The scouts for college teams are also coaches. Their season runs paralell to the high school season. Also colleges are limited by NCAA rules as to how many days scouts can travel to see high school players. Even if they by chance get to a game the player they came to see may have an off day. Going to different Universities baseball camps in the summer and fall are also good ways to get noticed. If you attend a small school it is very unlikely that scouts will come and see you play. They just don't have the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest K-911

Most people have a misconception about Baseball Scholarships. Colleges only get 11.7 baseball scholaships. Compared to 83 for football. You will find it is rare for a player to recieve a "full ride" scholarship. Almost all players that recieve baseball scholarships only get partial scholarships. They have to spread those 11.7 among 20 to 25 players. If a player gets 75% that is outstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest K-911

I was just trying to make the point that many players on scholarship for baseball do not get "full" scholarships compared to football and even basketball. There is big money being paid out these days for hitting and pitching lessons and for kids to play on select teams in hopes that their kid will get a baseball scholarship. The majority of these people don't realize that a baseball scholaship may not be what they think it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...