Jump to content

SA 3-0 @ WS 3-0/San Augustine wins 57-44!

CATMAN

By CATMAN
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

tigerheart

tigerheart

Posted
Posted
Besides district, not a lot to compare these two teams.  Only common opponent is Chireno.  WS lost to them in an early tournament by 2.  SA beat em by 30 around Christmas but SA was w/o their starting pg. 

I think WS is probably a lot better now then they were then.  I think SA will win, but don't really have a prediction.  Won't be surprised if its by 1 or by 30.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
[quote name="CATMAN" post="1365519" timestamp="1358790632"]
[quote author=89falcon link=topic=108425.msg1365462#msg1365462 date=1358772074]
SA is going to run them straght off the court. SA is at full strength now.
[/quote] They have been full strength for a while. 
[/quote]

Not so.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pinelandflash

pinelandflash

Posted
Posted
These 2 teams are nearly mirror images of each other, with both wanting to run and gun as many times as they can. Too close to call so no prediction. WS will have their hands full Tuesday, but so will SA. Should be an exciting game. As with the Broaddus game last week, whoever hits their outside shots and free throws consistently will prevail. Should be fun!!!!!!!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CATMAN

CATMAN

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Pinelandflash-----------Dist.231a div1 is very tough Dist.3 good teams with Zavalla waiting to beat one off the three.They have  WS Friday night @ Zavalla.Is Lufkin Pinewoods a public school.                                                                                                                                         
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tigerheart

tigerheart

Posted
Posted
[quote name="pinelandflash" post="1365623" timestamp="1358835745"]
These 2 teams are nearly mirror images of each other, with both wanting to run and gun as many times as they can. Too close to call so no prediction. WS will have their hands full Tuesday, but so will SA. Should be an exciting game. As with the Broaddus game last week, whoever hits their outside shots and free throws consistently will prevail. Should be fun!!!!!!!!!
[/quote]

I don't disagree with this statement...I'll just add this too it.  SA has 10 guys that can play and rotate in...West Sabine does it with 6.  Getting into a track meet isn't going to be their best bet.  WS is going to have to slow it down or they will just get worn out while SA is sending in fresh legs. 

CATMAN...Pineywoods is a private school in Lufkin...Awful at basketball.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pinelandflash

pinelandflash

Posted
Posted
[quote name="tigerheart" post="1365675" timestamp="1358868666"]
[quote author=pinelandflash link=topic=108425.msg1365623#msg1365623 date=1358835745]
These 2 teams are nearly mirror images of each other, with both wanting to run and gun as many times as they can. Too close to call so no prediction. WS will have their hands full Tuesday, but so will SA. Should be an exciting game. As with the Broaddus game last week, whoever hits their outside shots and free throws consistently will prevail. Should be fun!!!!!!!!!
[/quote]

I don't disagree with this statement...I'll just add this too it.  SA has 10 guys that can play and rotate in...West Sabine does it with 6.  Getting into a track meet isn't going to be their best bet.  WS is going to have to slow it down or they will just get worn out while SA is sending in fresh legs. 

CATMAN...Pineywoods is a private school in Lufkin...Awful at basketball.



@tigerheart------yes depth could be an issue, especially if they get into foul trouble. If they avoid that I see a high scoring game. Should be exciting either way. Hard to get pics for the paper though! Frenetic would be the word I would use to describe the pace of this game..............
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
[quote name="SAWolverine" post="1365956" timestamp="1358909782"]
I hear SA won 61-46!
[/quote]
So much for this one. As I said previously, SA would run them off the court. WS does not have the talent or athletes to hang with SA. Broaddus is about to get some on Friday. This district is done.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tigerheart

tigerheart

Posted
Posted
West Sabine came out playing hard and jumped on SA...but from about 4 minutes in to the end of the game, SA out scored em 58-35.  Great defensive effort from SA, not so great offensive effort. Barely 30% from the free throw line.  SA just imposed their will defensively once they gy settled down. Forced alt of turnovers, dominated the boards. Need to continue to improve on offense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Uncle Si

Uncle Si

Posted
Posted
From what I saw and this is strictly my opinion West Sabine's best 5 were better than San Augustine's best 5 BUT SA has good depth where WS has none and that was the difference in the game......  IF SA plays to their potential that depth could take them a long way.

Hey, and a lighter note, I sure do enjoy watchin' that SA coach (Tory Barnes).  He's a really good coach and is full of energy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tigerheart

tigerheart

Posted
Posted
I'd take SA's best 5 personally, but that's just me.  WS didn't have an answer for 1,3 or 4.  12 does the little things that don't get noticed.  You can fill in several guys to make that best 5 very good.  SA really didn't use their depth like they normally do.  The bench normally gets more minutes than last night.  But hey, A win is a win is a win. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Uncle Si

Uncle Si

Posted
Posted
[quote name="tigerheart" post="1366108" timestamp="1358956151"]
I'd take SA's best 5 personally, but that's just me.  WS didn't have an answer for 1,3 or 4.  12 does the little things that don't get noticed.  You can fill in several guys to make that best 5 very good.  SA really didn't use their depth like they normally do.  The bench normally gets more minutes than last night.  But hey, A win is a win is a win.
[/quote]I will agree that both teams are pretty dang good....  SA don't take Broaddus too lightly this Friday night, they are salty!!  Good luck SA!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • UT alum
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By UT alum · Posted

    • CardinalBacker
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...