Jump to content

Splendora at Tarkington Game Thread/Splendora wins 41-6!

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

TROJANSWIN

TROJANSWIN

Posted
Posted
[quote name="TeamJag-US" post="1313163" timestamp="1351459693"]
[quote author=TROJANSWIN link=topic=105287.msg1313158#msg1313158 date=1351459319]
[quote author=sports fan 9 link=topic=105287.msg1313015#msg1313015 date=1351444042]
Wow!  Team on the rise huh???
[/quote]
Sadly, in comparison to past years, this is an improvement.
[/quote]

??? How exactly?
[/quote]
Tarkington actually won a game this year.  In past years they have had 0 wins
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TeamJagUS

TeamJagUS

Posted
Posted
[quote name="TROJANSWIN" post="1313165" timestamp="1351459839"]
[quote author=TeamJag-US link=topic=105287.msg1313163#msg1313163 date=1351459693]
[quote author=TROJANSWIN link=topic=105287.msg1313158#msg1313158 date=1351459319]
[quote author=sports fan 9 link=topic=105287.msg1313015#msg1313015 date=1351444042]
Wow!  Team on the rise huh???
[/quote]
Sadly, in comparison to past years, this is an improvement.
[/quote]

??? How exactly?
[/quote]
Tarkington actually won a game this year.  In past years they have had 0 wins
[/quote]

That is not an improvement in program, that is an improvement in schedule. Did they play better in the first 4 games? Sure, but they didn't maintain that at all and more importantly didn't improve on what worked. That's a system failure not a player personnel issue. Of course you're entitled to think otherwise as I am entitled to think not so we'd just go back and forth all day, I just don't understand why this level of poor performance is defended by "well its bad, but better than the pathetic state it was allowed to slide to" and "give it yet ANOTHER year". It's that mentality that has put them here. That complacency will keep them there.

There were multiple win seasons in 08 and 09 (ok, 2 wins each) with at least one district win in each. So "improved over" 10-11 is not saying much even IF it's true.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hupernikomen

Hupernikomen

Posted
Posted
[quote name="TeamJag-US" post="1313188" timestamp="1351461862"]
[quote author=TROJANSWIN link=topic=105287.msg1313165#msg1313165 date=1351459839]
[quote author=TeamJag-US link=topic=105287.msg1313163#msg1313163 date=1351459693]
[quote author=TROJANSWIN link=topic=105287.msg1313158#msg1313158 date=1351459319]
[quote author=sports fan 9 link=topic=105287.msg1313015#msg1313015 date=1351444042]
Wow!  Team on the rise huh???
[/quote]
Sadly, in comparison to past years, this is an improvement.
[/quote]

??? How exactly?
[/quote]
Tarkington actually won a game this year.  In past years they have had 0 wins
[/quote]

That is not an improvement in program, that is an improvement in schedule. Did they play better in the first 4 games? Sure, but they didn't maintain that at all and more importantly didn't improve on what worked. That's a system failure not a player personnel issue. Of course you're entitled to think otherwise as I am entitled to think not so we'd just go back and forth all day, I just don't understand why this level of poor performance is defended by "well its bad, but better than the pathetic state it was allowed to slide to" and "give it yet ANOTHER year". It's that mentality that has put them here. That complacency will keep them there.

There were multiple win seasons in 08 and 09 (ok, 2 wins each) with at least one district win in each. So "improved over" 10-11 is not saying much even IF it's true.
[/quote]

Those from Tarkington have noticed the improvement.  Lower levels are performing good.  It will translate to future success, comparatively speaking.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
trojansgo04

trojansgo04

Posted
Posted
Yeah, I believe the current crop of sophomores(i believe alot are on varsity) are all kids who were in 7th grade when Carpenter got there, and are the first group of kids that have been truly developed at the Jr. High level by him and his staff. For sophomores on varsity they seem to be doing well. So yes, I would say definitely an improvement.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TeamJagUS

TeamJagUS

Posted
Posted
[quote name="sports fan 9" post="1313354" timestamp="1351473819"]
So in two years when the sophomore are seniors they will compete for a playoff spot?
[/quote]

That would be nice but for now just competing for a DISTRICT WIN would be nice. Lower levels have been doing "good" for a number of years, it's always "next year".
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CMurder75

CMurder75

Posted
Posted
To say Tarkington has made no improvement is silly. they may not be as competitive as people once thought they were, but it's not a easy path to correcting many years of losing. I see improvements, not just the varsity level, but especially on the JV, freshman and Middle school level. I think they've got a shot to be real competitive in a few years if they keep at it. those boys work hard and play harder that's something that's never in doubt watching them play on Friday nights. Sometimes you can't just go by W's and L's. They'll improve to start getting more W's and less L's in the future.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
twobag

twobag

Posted
Posted
I will agree the kids do play hard and give effort.  Correct me if I'm wrong...most small schools have their better freshmen and sophomore on varsity so its hard to judge the JV teams.  It just seems the progress is talked about  but doesn't show on the field.  It sure didn't take Shepherd long to turn it around.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
trojansgo04

trojansgo04

Posted
Posted
[quote name="sports fan 9" post="1313927" timestamp="1351537803"]
I will agree the kids do play hard and give effort.  Correct me if I'm wrong...most small schools have their better freshmen and sophomore on varsity so its hard to judge the JV teams.  It just seems the progress is talked about  but doesn't show on the field.  It sure didn't take Shepherd long to turn it around.
[/quote]
Ha comparing Tarkington to any school in the state let alone district doesn't really apply. Shepherd has had good seasons before, heck they were mighty competitive a few years back. Tarkington to the best of my knowledge is fighting the uphill climb of historically never even making the playoffs (at least to the best of my knowledge, if someone knows of them making the playoffs please do tell).
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hupernikomen

Hupernikomen

Posted
Posted
[quote name="trojansgo04" post="1314189" timestamp="1351558034"]
[quote author=sports fan 9 link=topic=105287.msg1313927#msg1313927 date=1351537803]
I will agree the kids do play hard and give effort.  Correct me if I'm wrong...most small schools have their better freshmen and sophomore on varsity so its hard to judge the JV teams.  It just seems the progress is talked about  but doesn't show on the field.  It sure didn't take Shepherd long to turn it around.
[/quote]
Ha comparing Tarkington to any school in the state let alone district doesn't really apply. Shepherd has had good seasons before, heck they were mighty competitive a few years back. Tarkington to the best of my knowledge is fighting the uphill climb of historically never even making the playoffs (at least to the best of my knowledge, if someone knows of them making the playoffs please do tell).
[/quote]

1953.  The one and only. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
belle-mere

belle-mere

Posted
Posted
[quote name="Hupernikomen" post="1314204" timestamp="1351558761"]
[quote author=trojansgo04 link=topic=105287.msg1314189#msg1314189 date=1351558034]
[quote author=sports fan 9 link=topic=105287.msg1313927#msg1313927 date=1351537803]
I will agree the kids do play hard and give effort.  Correct me if I'm wrong...most small schools have their better freshmen and sophomore on varsity so its hard to judge the JV teams.  It just seems the progress is talked about  but doesn't show on the field.  It sure didn't take Shepherd long to turn it around.
[/quote]
Ha comparing Tarkington to any school in the state let alone district doesn't really apply. Shepherd has had good seasons before, heck they were mighty competitive a few years back. Tarkington to the best of my knowledge is fighting the uphill climb of historically never even making the playoffs (at least to the best of my knowledge, if someone knows of them making the playoffs please do tell).
[/quote]

1953.  The onne and only.
[/quote]
This group of kids were on their way to improvement, when the old, losing mindset crept in after big losses to strong teams, Coldspring and Cleveland. They will have to find a way out of that attitude to find a measure of success, but I always like to believe it can happen, especially to a long-time underdog.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • BS Wildcats
      Fake Pandemic Scam Part 2?!

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...