Jump to content

PA Memorial at Deer Park Predictions


Recommended Posts

[quote name="ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY)" post="1281271" timestamp="1348538459"]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=103559.msg1281160#msg1281160 date=1348529977]
[quote author=mighymouse490 link=topic=103559.msg1281154#msg1281154 date=1348529471]
yes sir!! to be honest,[b]i'm more worried about the CV game[/b]. it's right before you know who. on top of that, do you go all out or do you limit the starters and bring them back in if needed?? hopefully they are not looking ahead.
[/quote] I hate when its CV week. Every game with them has been a struggle.
[/quote]

Especially when they come to P.A. and its  "homecoming". To me that's WAY worst than "do watcha wanna"
[/quote]
I see they took heed though Ghost; they play it whwn the game is over!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="mighymouse490" post="1281848" timestamp="1348599743"]
[quote author=mypooh link=topic=103559.msg1281439#msg1281439 date=1348557944]
Anyone having played in Deer Park should know they happen to drop a lot of flags on the opposing teams. A win on the road is a win. 27-17 PAM
[/quote]

for teams/places like that, you have to come out and punch them in the mouth!!
[/quote]
My point exactly are you maybe stuck looking like the Green Bay Packers on Monday Night
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Mr. Buddy Garrity" post="1281397" timestamp="1348547449"]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=103559.msg1281385#msg1281385 date=1348546665]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=103559.msg1281282#msg1281282 date=1348538811]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=103559.msg1281271#msg1281271 date=1348538459]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=103559.msg1281160#msg1281160 date=1348529977]
[quote author=mighymouse490 link=topic=103559.msg1281154#msg1281154 date=1348529471]
yes sir!! to be honest,[b]i'm more worried about the CV game[/b]. it's right before you know who. on top of that, do you go all out or do you limit the starters and bring them back in if needed?? hopefully they are not looking ahead.
[/quote] I hate when its CV week. Every game with them has been a struggle.
[/quote]

Especially when they come to P.A. and its  "homecoming". To me that's WAY worst than "do watcha wanna"
[/quote] Didnt they ruin Homecoming just a few years ago and nearly cost us a playoff spot?
[/quote]
[b]It was the 2010 season[/b].

[quote author=LP0175 link=topic=103559.msg1281353#msg1281353 date=1348544148]
[b]This is a cocky trend...you're better than this [/b]8)
[/quote]

What do you mean?
[/quote]  :-[
[/quote]

Not like that you goofballs! I simply mean there is a faint stinch of arrogance. I'm hoping you beat the deer senseless but don't underestimate them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="LP0175" post="1282961" timestamp="1348721939"]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=103559.msg1281397#msg1281397 date=1348547449]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=103559.msg1281385#msg1281385 date=1348546665]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=103559.msg1281282#msg1281282 date=1348538811]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=103559.msg1281271#msg1281271 date=1348538459]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=103559.msg1281160#msg1281160 date=1348529977]
[quote author=mighymouse490 link=topic=103559.msg1281154#msg1281154 date=1348529471]
yes sir!! to be honest,[b]i'm more worried about the CV game[/b]. it's right before you know who. on top of that, do you go all out or do you limit the starters and bring them back in if needed?? hopefully they are not looking ahead.
[/quote] I hate when its CV week. Every game with them has been a struggle.
[/quote]

Especially when they come to P.A. and its  "homecoming". To me that's WAY worst than "do watcha wanna"
[/quote] Didnt they ruin Homecoming just a few years ago and nearly cost us a playoff spot?
[/quote]
[b]It was the 2010 season[/b].

[quote author=LP0175 link=topic=103559.msg1281353#msg1281353 date=1348544148]
[b]This is a cocky trend...you're better than this [/b]8)
[/quote]

What do you mean?
[/quote]  :-[
[/quote]

Not like that you goofballs! I simply mean there is a faint stinch of arrogance. I'm hoping you beat the deer senseless but don't underestimate them.
[/quote]

Ooo k
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would not call it arrogance. DP is a passing team. PAM's defense is built to stop the pass. with 5 fast,experienced,hard hitting,ball hawking db's,it does not go in DP favor. DP defense gives up ALOT. on paper and at this point that's all it is, PAM should take this one.

since this came from a LP poster, i take it since all the "controversy" and injuries going on at LP, LP is not in the lime light. don't worry,you will get your shot ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
    • The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel.  I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...