Jump to content

LaPorte/Pearland Dawson Scrimmage Thread/Post comments here!

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

OlDawg

OlDawg

Posted
Posted
[quote name="panamamyers" post="1251049" timestamp="1345914873"]
I got an update about 45 minutes in that neither team had scored.
Can you give us some more details?
[/quote]I wasn't able to attend. Sounds--from feedback--like the practice with PD was a good exercise for both teams with LP being able to play 2's and others significant time to check depth. D sounds as advertised. Sounds like the replacement LB's were a smooth transition. Personally, I was slightly concerned about this area losing so much experience. Run game seems on point. New QB did fine, but still needs more time to get used to game speed. Apparently, showed the skills necessary to add another dimension to LP's attack. Don't know score. Don't care. It was an evaluation/practice game. No significant injuries. Sounds like a good scrimmage for both.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ThaGhost

ThaGhost

Posted
Posted
[quote name="OlDawg" post="1251067" timestamp="1345916674"]
[quote author=panamamyers link=topic=102003.msg1251049#msg1251049 date=1345914873]
I got an update about 45 minutes in that neither team had scored.
Can you give us some more details?
[/quote]I wasn't able to attend. Sounds--from feedback--like the practice with PD was a good exercise for both teams with LP being able to play 2's and others significant time to check depth. D sounds as advertised. Sounds like the replacement LB's were a smooth transition. Personally, I was slightly concerned about this area losing so much experience. Run game seems on point. New QB did fine, but still needs more time to get used to game speed. Apparently, showed the skills necessary to add another dimension to LP's attack. Don't know score. Don't care. It was an evaluation/practice game. No significant injuries. Sounds like a good scrimmage for both.
[/quote]

Sounds like another poster from another site.... Wasn't able to attend, but feedback seems to be pretty positive. I--personally--was slightly worried about LB play on D. Sounds like the transition was made without a hitch. Pearland Dawson was a good opponent for a scrimmage. Good squad. I understand no significant injuries. Good news. Hard-hitting. Good news. Understand the run game was on point. Understand the QB is still getting used to game speed, but had some good throws.

Sounds to me like D, run game on point. QB has the skills necessary to add another dimension. No significant injuries.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OlDawg

OlDawg

Posted
Posted
[quote name="ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY)" post="1251239" timestamp="1345935738"]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251067#msg1251067 date=1345916674]
[quote author=panamamyers link=topic=102003.msg1251049#msg1251049 date=1345914873]
I got an update about 45 minutes in that neither team had scored.
Can you give us some more details?
[/quote]I wasn't able to attend. Sounds--from feedback--like the practice with PD was a good exercise for both teams with LP being able to play 2's and others significant time to check depth. D sounds as advertised. Sounds like the replacement LB's were a smooth transition. Personally, I was slightly concerned about this area losing so much experience. Run game seems on point. New QB did fine, but still needs more time to get used to game speed. Apparently, showed the skills necessary to add another dimension to LP's attack. Don't know score. Don't care. It was an evaluation/practice game. No significant injuries. Sounds like a good scrimmage for both.
[/quote]

Sounds like another poster from another site.... Wasn't able to attend, but feedback seems to be pretty positive. I--personally--was slightly worried about LB play on D. Sounds like the transition was made without a hitch. Pearland Dawson was a good opponent for a scrimmage. Good squad. I understand no significant injuries. Good news. Hard-hitting. Good news. Understand the run game was on point. Understand the QB is still getting used to game speed, but had some good throws.

Sounds to me like D, run game on point. QB has the skills necessary to add another dimension. No significant injuries.
[/quote]Same poster. Yeppers, you know him. BG knows. I've told you guys before... ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ThaGhost

ThaGhost

Posted
Posted
[quote name="OlDawg" post="1251559" timestamp="1345980873"]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=102003.msg1251239#msg1251239 date=1345935738]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251067#msg1251067 date=1345916674]
[quote author=panamamyers link=topic=102003.msg1251049#msg1251049 date=1345914873]
I got an update about 45 minutes in that neither team had scored.
Can you give us some more details?
[/quote]I wasn't able to attend. Sounds--from feedback--like the practice with PD was a good exercise for both teams with LP being able to play 2's and others significant time to check depth. D sounds as advertised. Sounds like the replacement LB's were a smooth transition. Personally, I was slightly concerned about this area losing so much experience. Run game seems on point. New QB did fine, but still needs more time to get used to game speed. Apparently, showed the skills necessary to add another dimension to LP's attack. Don't know score. Don't care. It was an evaluation/practice game. No significant injuries. Sounds like a good scrimmage for both.
[/quote]

Sounds like another poster from another site.... Wasn't able to attend, but feedback seems to be pretty positive. I--personally--was slightly worried about LB play on D. Sounds like the transition was made without a hitch. Pearland Dawson was a good opponent for a scrimmage. Good squad. I understand no significant injuries. Good news. Hard-hitting. Good news. Understand the run game was on point. Understand the QB is still getting used to game speed, but had some good throws.

Sounds to me like D, run game on point. QB has the skills necessary to add another dimension. No significant injuries.
[/quote]Same poster. Yeppers, you know him. BG knows. I've told you guys before... ;)
[/quote]

I knew it had to be you! No I didn't get that memo either(along with the Iguana Joe's pow wow, b4 NS vs LP)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OlDawg

OlDawg

Posted
Posted
[quote name="ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY)" post="1251582" timestamp="1345985184"]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251559#msg1251559 date=1345980873]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=102003.msg1251239#msg1251239 date=1345935738]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251067#msg1251067 date=1345916674]
[quote author=panamamyers link=topic=102003.msg1251049#msg1251049 date=1345914873]
I got an update about 45 minutes in that neither team had scored.
Can you give us some more details?
[/quote]I wasn't able to attend. Sounds--from feedback--like the practice with PD was a good exercise for both teams with LP being able to play 2's and others significant time to check depth. D sounds as advertised. Sounds like the replacement LB's were a smooth transition. Personally, I was slightly concerned about this area losing so much experience. Run game seems on point. New QB did fine, but still needs more time to get used to game speed. Apparently, showed the skills necessary to add another dimension to LP's attack. Don't know score. Don't care. It was an evaluation/practice game. No significant injuries. Sounds like a good scrimmage for both.
[/quote]

Sounds like another poster from another site.... Wasn't able to attend, but feedback seems to be pretty positive. I--personally--was slightly worried about LB play on D. Sounds like the transition was made without a hitch. Pearland Dawson was a good opponent for a scrimmage. Good squad. I understand no significant injuries. Good news. Hard-hitting. Good news. Understand the run game was on point. Understand the QB is still getting used to game speed, but had some good throws.

Sounds to me like D, run game on point. QB has the skills necessary to add another dimension. No significant injuries.
[/quote]Same poster. Yeppers, you know him. BG knows. I've told you guys before... ;)
[/quote]

I knew it had to be you! No I didn't get that memo either(along with the Iguana Joe's pow wow, b4 NS vs LP)
[/quote]Pretty easy to figure out I wasn't LP0175, eh?  ;D (Normal username was already taken...)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LP0175

LP0175

Posted
Posted
[quote name="OlDawg" post="1251583" timestamp="1345985686"]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=102003.msg1251582#msg1251582 date=1345985184]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251559#msg1251559 date=1345980873]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=102003.msg1251239#msg1251239 date=1345935738]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251067#msg1251067 date=1345916674]
[quote author=panamamyers link=topic=102003.msg1251049#msg1251049 date=1345914873]
I got an update about 45 minutes in that neither team had scored.
Can you give us some more details?
[/quote]I wasn't able to attend. Sounds--from feedback--like the practice with PD was a good exercise for both teams with LP being able to play 2's and others significant time to check depth. D sounds as advertised. Sounds like the replacement LB's were a smooth transition. Personally, I was slightly concerned about this area losing so much experience. Run game seems on point. New QB did fine, but still needs more time to get used to game speed. Apparently, showed the skills necessary to add another dimension to LP's attack. Don't know score. Don't care. It was an evaluation/practice game. No significant injuries. Sounds like a good scrimmage for both.
[/quote]

Sounds like another poster from another site.... Wasn't able to attend, but feedback seems to be pretty positive. I--personally--was slightly worried about LB play on D. Sounds like the transition was made without a hitch. Pearland Dawson was a good opponent for a scrimmage. Good squad. I understand no significant injuries. Good news. Hard-hitting. Good news. Understand the run game was on point. Understand the QB is still getting used to game speed, but had some good throws.

Sounds to me like D, run game on point. QB has the skills necessary to add another dimension. No significant injuries.
[/quote]Same poster. Yeppers, you know him. BG knows. I've told you guys before... ;)
[/quote]

I knew it had to be you! No I didn't get that memo either(along with the Iguana Joe's pow wow, b4 NS vs LP)
[/quote]Pretty easy to figure out I wasn't LP0175, eh?  ;D (Normal username was already taken...)
[/quote]
???
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OlDawg

OlDawg

Posted
Posted
[quote name="LP0175" post="1251652" timestamp="1345994918"]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251583#msg1251583 date=1345985686]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=102003.msg1251582#msg1251582 date=1345985184]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251559#msg1251559 date=1345980873]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=102003.msg1251239#msg1251239 date=1345935738]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251067#msg1251067 date=1345916674]
[quote author=panamamyers link=topic=102003.msg1251049#msg1251049 date=1345914873]
I got an update about 45 minutes in that neither team had scored.
Can you give us some more details?
[/quote]I wasn't able to attend. Sounds--from feedback--like the practice with PD was a good exercise for both teams with LP being able to play 2's and others significant time to check depth. D sounds as advertised. Sounds like the replacement LB's were a smooth transition. Personally, I was slightly concerned about this area losing so much experience. Run game seems on point. New QB did fine, but still needs more time to get used to game speed. Apparently, showed the skills necessary to add another dimension to LP's attack. Don't know score. Don't care. It was an evaluation/practice game. No significant injuries. Sounds like a good scrimmage for both.
[/quote]

Sounds like another poster from another site.... Wasn't able to attend, but feedback seems to be pretty positive. I--personally--was slightly worried about LB play on D. Sounds like the transition was made without a hitch. Pearland Dawson was a good opponent for a scrimmage. Good squad. I understand no significant injuries. Good news. Hard-hitting. Good news. Understand the run game was on point. Understand the QB is still getting used to game speed, but had some good throws.

Sounds to me like D, run game on point. QB has the skills necessary to add another dimension. No significant injuries.
[/quote]Same poster. Yeppers, you know him. BG knows. I've told you guys before... ;)
[/quote]

I knew it had to be you! No I didn't get that memo either(along with the Iguana Joe's pow wow, b4 NS vs LP)
[/quote]Pretty easy to figure out I wasn't LP0175, eh?  ;D (Normal username was already taken...)
[/quote]
???
[/quote]We know each other from other places.  ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ThaGhost

ThaGhost

Posted
Posted
[quote name="OlDawg" post="1251583" timestamp="1345985686"]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=102003.msg1251582#msg1251582 date=1345985184]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251559#msg1251559 date=1345980873]
[quote author=ThaGhost(P.A. ALL DAY) link=topic=102003.msg1251239#msg1251239 date=1345935738]
[quote author=OlDawg link=topic=102003.msg1251067#msg1251067 date=1345916674]
[quote author=panamamyers link=topic=102003.msg1251049#msg1251049 idate=1345914873]
I got an update about 45 minutes in that neither team had scored.
Can you give us some more details?
[/quote]I wasn't able to attend. Sounds--from feedback--like the practice with PD was a good exercise for both teams with LP being able to play 2's and others significant time to check depth. D sounds as advertised. Sounds like the replacement LB's were a smooth transition. Personally, I was slightly concerned about this area losing so much experience. Run game seems on point. New QB did fine, but still needs more time to get used to game speed. Apparently, showed the skills necessary to add another dimension to LP's attack. Don't know score. Don't care. It was an evaluation/practice game. No significant injuries. Sounds like a good scrimmage for both.
[/quote]

Sounds like another poster from another site.... Wasn't able to attend, but feedback seems to be pretty positive. I--personally--was slightly worried about LB play on D. Sounds like the transition was made without a hitch. Pearland Dawson was a good opponent for a scrimmage. Good squad. I understand no significant injuries. Good news. Hard-hitting. Good news. Understand the run game was on point. Understand the QB is still getting used to game speed, but had some good throws.

Sounds to me like D, run game on point. QB has the skills necessary to add another dimension. No significant injuries.
[/quote]Same poster. Yeppers, you know him. BG knows. I've told you guys before... ;)
[/quote]

I knew it had to be you! No I didn't get that memo either(along with the Iguana Joe's pow wow, b4 NS vs LP)
[/quote]Pretty easy to figure out I wasn't LP0175, eh?  ;D (Normal username was already taken...)
[/quote]

Oh OK...did you see how your Bulldog brethren (LP0175) "accidentally" reported me? Man you guys trying to get us banned everywhere huh? (j/k there 0175)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
songone

songone

Posted
Posted
Well I was onsight and LP flatout punished Dawson on both sides of the ball.  THAT SIMPLE!
Dawson doesn't have a QB and ran James White maybe 6 or 7 times... each time he gained very good yardage.  Of course Upchurch made his usual catches when the ball was delivered well.
As far LP... they looked very, very good on both sides. Took the foot off the gas after first series, but things could have gotten ugly for Dawson.  Whitley and the other backs ran at will... gaining yard after yard.  Defense pursued the ball and made plays all night... 1's and 2's.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lpbulldogblog

lpbulldogblog

Posted
Posted
[quote name="songone" post="1252317" timestamp="1346070655"]
Well I was onsight and LP flatout punished Dawson on both sides of the ball.  THAT SIMPLE!
Dawson doesn't have a QB and ran James White maybe 6 or 7 times... each time he gained very good yardage.  Of course Upchurch made his usual catches when the ball was delivered well.
As far LP... they looked very, very good on both sides. Took the foot off the gas after first series, but things could have gotten ugly for Dawson.  Whitley and the other backs ran at will... gaining yard after yard.  Defense pursued the ball and made plays all night... 1's and 2's.
[/quote]

Well, it was a good night for La Porte.  They're ready.

You are a Manvel fan, correct?

I was impressed with what LP did to Dawson.  I expected it to be a little more even.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
songone

songone

Posted
Posted
[quote name="lpbulldogblog" post="1252462" timestamp="1346079917"]
[quote author=songone link=topic=102003.msg1252317#msg1252317 date=1346070655]
Well I was onsight and LP flatout punished Dawson on both sides of the ball.  THAT SIMPLE!
Dawson doesn't have a QB and ran James White maybe 6 or 7 times... each time he gained very good yardage.  Of course Upchurch made his usual catches when the ball was delivered well.
As far LP... they looked very, very good on both sides. Took the foot off the gas after first series, but things could have gotten ugly for Dawson.  Whitley and the other backs ran at will... gaining yard after yard.  Defense pursued the ball and made plays all night... 1's and 2's.
[/quote]

Well, it was a good night for La Porte.  They're ready.

You are a Manvel fan, correct?

I was impressed with what LP did to Dawson.  I expected it to be a little more even.
[/quote]Yes I'm a Manvel fan 100%.  I like Dawson too... have a best friend and relatives over there.  I'm also a realist, LP punished them boys.  LP looks good bro.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
songone

songone

Posted
Posted
[quote name="panamamyers" post="1252614" timestamp="1346089129"]
or FB Hightower.
Crazy how many athletes are in that one 5 mile radius there.
I bet they start building more neighborhoods down Lakes of Savannah way too, so Manvel will only get better,
[/quote]A lot of those kids live in Lakes of Savannah, South Fork, Rodeo Palms and Shadow Creek... Each neighborhood constantly building homes.  Manvel is deep... I'm guessing the "supposed" Shadow Creek High School coming around 2016 will hurt the talent pool.  But let's enjoy until that day comes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up All Times Central (and hopefully correct) - (#) Regional Seed - TV will be noted below, all other games stream on ESPN+ Arranged by paired Regionals - Left Side of the Bracket (1/16 - 8/9 : 4/13 - 5/12)/ Right Side of the Bracket (2/15 - 7/10 : 3/14 - 6//11) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#1 Tennessee -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (3) Indiana 10 - (2) Southern Miss 4   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (4) Northern Kentucky 3 - (1) Tennessee 9   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3:  (2) Southern Miss 6 - (4) Northern Kentucky 0   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up (The Vikings of Kentucky Eliminated) G4:  (1) Tennessee 12 - (3) Indiana 6   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5 : 11:00 AM (2) Southern Miss vs (3) Indiana (Loser Eliminated) G6: 5:00 PM (1) Tennessee vs Game 5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#16 East Carolina -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (4) Evansville 4 - (1) East Carolina 1   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (3) Virginia Commonwealth 1 - (2) Wake Forest 0   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (2) Wake Forest 6 - (1) East Carolina 7   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up (The consensus preseason #1 Demon Deacons dragged to down to Hell) G4: (4) Evansville 17 - (3) Virginia Commonwealth 11   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 11:00 AM (1) East Carolina vs (3) Virginia Commonwealth (Loser Eliminated) G6: 5:00 PM (4) Evansville vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#8 Florida St. -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (4) Stetson 2 - (1) Florida St. 7   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (3) Central Florida 8 - (2) Bama 7   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (2) Bama 0 - (4) Stetson 4   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up (The Tide Eliminated)  G4: (1) Florida St. 5 - (3) Central Florida 2   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5 : 11:00 AM (4) Stetson vs (3) Central Florida (Loser Eliminated) G6: 5:00 PM (1) Florida St. vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#9 Oklahoma -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (3) Connecticut 4 - (2) Duke 1   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2:  (4) Oral Roberts 0 - (1) Oklahoma 14   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (2) Duke 6 - (4) Oral Roberts 2   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up (The Fightin' Bobs Eliminated) G4: (1) Oklahoma 1 - (3) Connecticut 4   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 2:00 PM (2) Duke vs (1) Oklahoma (Loser Eliminated) (ESPN) G6: 8:00 PM (3) Connecticut vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   (#4 North Carolina -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (3) Wofford 3 - (2) LSU 4   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (4) Long Island 8 - (1) North Carolina 11   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (4) Long Island 2 - (3) Wofford 5   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (LIU Eliminated) G4: (2) LSU 2 - (1) North Carolina 6   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 11:00 AM (3) Wofford vs (2) LSU (Loser Eliminated) (ESPN) G6: 5:00 PM (1) North Carolina vs (1) North Carolina Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#13 Arizona -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (3) West Virginia 4 (2) Dallas Baptist 1   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (4) Grand Canyon 9 - (1) Arizona 4   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (2) Dallas Baptist 7 - (1) Arizona 0  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (The Wildcats Eliminated) G4: (4) Grand Canyon 2 - (3) West Virginia 5   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 2:00 PM (2) Dallas Baptist vs (4) Grand Canyon (Loser Eliminated) G6: 7:00 PM (3) West Virginia vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#5 Arkansas -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (4) Southeast Missouri 9 - (1) Arkansas 17   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   7:00 PM (3) K-State 9 - (2) la tech 4 ( This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Saturday June 1st G2: (3) K-State 19 - (2) la tech 4   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (Resumption of suspended game) G3: (2) la tech 3 - (4) Southeast Missouri 9   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up (Louisiana tards Eliminated) G4: (1) Arkansas 6 - (3) K-State 7   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 1:00 PM (1) Arkansas vs (4) Southeast Missouri (Loser Eliminated) G6: 6:00 PM (3) K-State vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#12 Virginia -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (4) Penn 2 - (1) Virginia 4   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (3) St. John's 2 - (2) Mississippi St. 5 (10)  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (4) Penn 9 - (3) St. John's 10 (12)   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up (The Quakers Eliminated) G4: (2) Mississippi St. 4 - (1) Virginia 5   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 11:00 AM (2) Mississippi St. vs (3) St. John's (Loser Eliminated) (ESPN2) G6: 5:00 PM (1) Virginia vs Game 5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) ________________________________________________________________________________________ This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#2 Kentucky -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (4) Western Michigan 8 - (1) Kentucky 10   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (3) Illinois 4 - (2) Indiana St. 1   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (2) Indiana St. 6 - (4) Western Michigan 4   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (The Broncs are Eliminated) G4: (1) Kentucky 6 - (3) Illinois 1   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 11:00 AM (2) Indiana St.vs (3) Illinois (Loser Eliminated) G6: 5:00 PM (1) Kentucky vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#15 Oregon St. -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (3) Nicholls St. 12 - (2) California-Irvine 13   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (4) Tulane 4 - (1) Oregon St. 10   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (4) Tulane 3 - (3) Nicholls St. 0   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (The Colonels Eliminated) G4: (2) California-Irvine 3 - (1) Oregon St. 5   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 2:00 PM (2) California-Irvine vs (4) Tulane (Loser Eliminate) G6: 8:00 PM (1) Oregon St.vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#7 Georgia -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (4) Army 7 - (1) Georgia 8   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (3) Georgia Tech 0 - (2) North Carolina-Wilmington 9   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3:  (4) Army 2 - (3) Georgia Tech 4   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (The Black Knights Eliminated) G4:  (2) North Carolina-Wilmington 2 -(1) Georgia 11   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 11:00 AM (2) North Carolina-Wilmington vs (3) Georgia Tech (Loser Eliminated) (ACC Network) G6: 5:00 PM (1) Georgia vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#10 North Carolina St. -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (3) James Madison 7 - (2) South Carolina 8 (10)   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (4) Bryant 2 - (1) North Carolina St. 9   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (4) Bryant 1 - (3) James Madison 8   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (Bryant Bulldogs Eliminated) G4: (2) South Carolina 4 - (1) North Carolina St. 6  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 11:00 AM (2) South Carolina vs (3) James Madison (Loser Eliminated) (ESPNU) G6: 5:00 PM (1) North Carolina St. vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#3 Fightin' Texas Aggies -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (4) Grambling 0 - (1) Fightin' Texas Aggies 8   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (3) t.u. 12 - (2) ULaLa 5   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (2) ULaLa 12 - (4) Grambling 5   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (The Tigers Eliminated) G4: (1) Fightin' Texas Aggies 4 - (3) t.u. 2 (11)   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 2:00 PM (2) ULaLa vs (3) t.u. (ESPN2) G6: 7:00 PM (1) Fightin' Texas Aggies vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up (#14 California- Santa Barbara -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31 G1: (2) San Diego (3) Oregon 5 - (2) San Diego 4 (11)   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (4) Fresno St. 6 - (1) California-Santa Barbara 9   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3:  (2) San Diego 7 - (4) Fresno St. 5   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (Fresno St. Eliminated) G4:  (1) California-Santa Barbara 1 - (3) Oregon 2   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 2:00 PM (2) San Diego vs (1) California-Santa Barbara (Loser Eliminate) (ESPNU) G6: 8:00 PM (3) Oregon vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#6 Clemson -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (3) Coastal Carolina 13 - (2) Vandy 3   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (SEC Network) G2: (4) High Point 3 - (1) Clemson 4   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (2) Vandy 9 - (4) High Point 10   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (VandyBoys are Eliminated) G4: (1) Clemson 4 - (3) Coastal Carolina 3   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 11:00 AM (4) High Point vs (3) Coastal Carolina (Loser Eliminate) G6: 5:00 PM (1) Clemson vs G5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  (#11 Okie State -  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) Friday May 31st G1: (3) Florida 5 - (2) Nebraska 2   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up G2: (4) Niagara 7 - (1) Okie State 19   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Saturday June 1st G3: (2) Nebraska 7 - (4) Niagara 5   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up (The Purple Eagles Eliminated) G4: (1) Okie State 7 - (3) Florida 1   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Sunday June 2nd G5: 1:00 PM (2) Nebraska vs (3) Florida (Loser Eliminated) (SEC Network) G6: 6:00 PM (1) Okie State vs Game 5 Winner Monday June 3rd G7: TBD G4 Winner vs G5 Winner (if necessary
    • pine curtain
      Orangefield vs. Franklin - FRANKLIN ADVANCES!

      By pine curtain · Posted

      The way they are talking sounds like they were from Beaumont.
    • Setx fan
      Playoff Division 1 & Divison 2 for basketball

      By Setx fan · Posted

      I don't really like it but depending on how the brackets play out it could possibly help Woodville win a playoff game or 2 
    • LumRaiderFan
      Why my presidential vote will be for (candidate X)

      By LumRaiderFan · Posted

      I can’t think of one good reason unless you are currently receiving or hoping to receive an entitlement from the government.
    • BS Wildcats
      Will Biden Be The Democratic Nominee For President?

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      If she’s a nurse, as she claims, she should see the signs of biden’s cognitive impairment.  Either she’s not very smart, or she’s just ignoring it!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...