If a man won’t take care of the ones he’s fathered, why should he be allowed to keep on having them? Naturally, as a close minded male you don’t consider the fact that oftentimes lack of access to abortion will result in the woman no longer being able to bear children, so what’s the difference? Lack of choice is lack of choice.  Look, I’m going kind of Johnathan Swift  on this one because the whole issue is just that bizarre. It boils down to the woman (or man’s) choice. Why would you want the State in the bedroom more than you want it in the boardroom?
Recommended Posts