Jump to content

1A -- Reg III-Div 1 & Reg IV-Div 2 Playoff Slots


Joharr73

Recommended Posts

[quote name="bcbt2" post="1105499" timestamp="1320468994"]
Just got word that due to point spread and the three way tie in district 14, it will be Burkeville in and not HI for the third place spot and Sabine Pass in the second place spot.
[/quote]

Where did you get that information, because 1A schools have a +/- 21 point cap in figuring out tie-breakers?

I figured these numbers based off scores between the 3 teams:

HI @ Burk  16-26  -10
HI @ SP    28-22    +6                            [size=18pt]3rd[/size]
[b]HI ===========    -4[/b]
[u].                                                                    [/u]
HI @ SP    22-28    -6
SP @ Burk  38-8    +21                          [size=18pt]2nd[/size]
[b]SP ===========  +15[/b]
[u].                                                                    [/u]
HI @ Burk  26-16    +10
SP @ Burk  8-38    -21                          [size=18pt]4th[/size]
[b]Burk ==========  -11[/b]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, there was a scoring issue in the HI & Burk game.  It was orginally posted as 26-16, but in fact it was 34-16 for Burkeville.  So Burkeville & not High Island will be in the playoffs.

Sorry for the confusion, but the wrong information out there.

HI @ Burk  16-34  -18
HI @ SP    28-22    +6                            [size=18pt]4th[/size]
[b]HI ===========    -12[/b]
[u].                                                                    [/u]
HI @ SP    22-28    -6
SP @ Burk  38-8    +21                          [size=18pt]2nd[/size]
[b]SP ===========  +15[/b]
[u].                                                                    [/u]
HI @ Burk  34-16    +18
SP @ Burk  8-38    -21                          [size=18pt]3rd[/size]
[b]Burk ==========  -3[/b]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

District 13 results

Granger  5 - 0
Milano    4 - 1
Burton    3 - 2
Bartlett  2 - 3
Holland  1 - 4
Snook    0 - 5

Granger beat Milano  6 - 0; Burton beat Holland  27 - 13 and not sure about the Bartlett/Snook score but positive Bartlett won
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="TAMU" post="1105593" timestamp="1320474857"]
District 13 results

Granger  5 - 0
Milano    4 - 1
Burton    3 - 2
Bartlett  2 - 3
Holland  1 - 4
Snook    0 - 5

Granger beat Milano  6 - 0; Burton beat Holland  27 - 13 and not sure about the Bartlett/Snook score but positive Bartlett won
[/quote]

Where are you from & who do you support, TAMU?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Joharr, its the pinelandflash again!  Looks like we're gonna be playing at Crockett as well. Probably on Saturday in a re-match from last year against Moody. Good luck against Thrall! If ya'll play them as hard as you played us, you should have no problem. Never been to that stadium so send me some directions if you can, ok? Would be appreciated greatly lol. Was late getting to H-D tonight!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="pinelandflash" post="1105606" timestamp="1320480069"]
Hey Joharr, its the pinelandflash again!  Looks like we're gonna be playing at Crockett as well. Probably on Saturday in a re-match from last year against Moody. Good luck against Thrall! If ya'll play them as hard as you played us, you should have no problem. Never been to that stadium so send me some directions if you can, ok? Would be appreciated greatly lol. Was late getting to H-D tonight!
[/quote]

Dang, they didn't kick to our stud returner at all.  Congrats on your win, I believe that both of our schools will make into the 2nd.


Directions from Pineland to Crockett:

North on Hwy 96 to Hwy 103 turn West

Go through Lufkin

Hwy 103 then merges to into Hwy 7 keep going West

Hwy 7 into Crockett, go South on 304 loop, stadium is on the South West side of town
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Joharr73" post="1105594" timestamp="1320474971"]
[quote author=TAMU link=topic=90095.msg1105593#msg1105593 date=1320474857]
District 13 results

Granger  5 - 0
Milano    4 - 1
Burton    3 - 2
Bartlett  2 - 3
Holland  1 - 4
Snook    0 - 5

Granger beat Milano  6 - 0; Burton beat Holland  27 - 13 and not sure about the Bartlett/Snook score but positive Bartlett won
[/quote]

Where are you from & who do you support, TAMU?
[/quote]

I support High School Football  8)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="TAMU" post="1105593" timestamp="1320474857"]
District 13 results

Granger  5 - 0
Milano    4 - 1
Burton    3 - 2
Bartlett  2 - 3
Holland  1 - 4
Snook    0 - 5

Granger beat Milano  6 - 0; Burton beat Holland  27 - 13 and not sure about the Bartlett/Snook score but positive Bartlett won
[/quote]
Bartlett 32 Snook 30 Final
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...