Jump to content

week 9 Senior Predictions..HUGE WEEK


Recommended Posts

10/22/2011
7:00 LUM-W  BC  ... Lumberton WHite 28 to 14
5:00 LUM-B  WOS  ... WOS 33 to 6
2:00 KTZ  NED-B  ... KTZ 26 to 20
6:00 PA  PNG-P  ... PA 40 to 0
4:00  VID  LC  ...LC 33 to 0
10:00 BMT  PNG-W ...  PNG W 35 to 0
7:00 OF  NED-W ... NED W 34 to 6


This is a really big week of football...A couple of games will determine the entire playoff bracket..SHould be very interesting!
I am skipping LAmar Homecoming to watch the LUM W/ BC game lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Willbeat23" post="1085140" timestamp="1318794907"]
BradyB, if you wanna go to that Lamar game, go ahead! I can pretty much tell ya how the LumW/ BC games gonna go down now!
[/quote]

Willbeat23 aka raider44 good luck Saturday its gonna be a great game. I can't wait.  I will be the better man and say I don't know what's gonna happen but I promise it will be a battle till the end. Nothing wrong with being a little over confident with your team but that sometimes makes the lost a little harder to swallow ..lol :'( :-* ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="RB" post="1085635" timestamp="1318817465"]
[quote author=Gusher link=topic=89958.msg1085507#msg1085507 date=1318809488]
The Kountze vs Nederland Black has te makings to be a very good game.
[/quote]

Ned Black wins by 14.. :o
[/quote]
Im torn on this one. Kountze beat PNG W 25-20 and Ned B lost to PNG W 7-0. Seems like a pick or slight edge to Kountze.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ned BLK wins

vs WOS (2nd week and wasn't ready for WOS)
vs Lum W ( didn't stop the power I but will be prepared next time)
vs BC (back and forth on scoring- 80 yard Int called back and let them get on top)
vs PNG W(  :-[ had 21 + points but couldn't put it in in the red zone, only positive yards D gave up was one scoring option play)

We're just laying low..LOL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...