Jump to content

Pee Wee Scores Week 5


WD170

Recommended Posts

[quote name="SmashMouth" post="1065672" timestamp="1316922530"]
[quote author=Ochocinco link=topic=88798.msg1065628#msg1065628 date=1316919080]
They run a very wicked offense. Very impressive for that age. When I thought they were running it one way, 23, 11,or 3 was taking it another way.
[/quote]Lumberton offense was more smash mouth. Bmt offense is way more explosive.

Lum W has that same style...hard to defend.
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the stats I collected are correct, here's the BMT G (5-0) vs LUM R (4-1) breakdown:

BMT G in 5 games
Scored 172 pts  (34.4/game)
Gave up 18 pts (3.6/game)

LUM R in 5 games
Scored 143 pts  (28.6/game)
Gave up 18 pts (4/game)

On paper you got to go with BMT G.  Both have played at least one decent team (BMT G vs NED B) (LUM R vs WOS); however, LUM R toughest opponent is considerably better than BMT G's toughest.  Gonna be a close one.  Isn't it fun breaking down 8 year old's matchups? LOL!


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen them all play and we have played Bmt - G, Lum - W, and PA. Heres what I have
1. PNG - G (They bring the heat for 4 full qtrs...)
2. Bmt - G (you cant coach speed, )
3. Lum - W (if 8 comes back)
4. WOS - (Defense)
5. Lum - R
All of these teams are really good, I look forward to seeing how it all plays out in the end! Good luck to all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="CF22" post="1067065" timestamp="1317085181"]
I have seen them all play and we have played Bmt - G, Lum - W, and PA. Heres what I have
1. PNG - G (They bring the heat for 4 full qtrs...)
2. Bmt - G (you cant coach speed, )
3. Lum - W (if 8 comes back)
4. WOS - (Defense)
5. Lum - R
All of these teams are really good, I look forward to seeing how it all plays out in the end! Good luck to all.
[/quote]

What's your comment on Lum R ? By the way, I think your top 5 is spot on and in that order!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="SmashMouth" post="1066954" timestamp="1317075213"]
[quote author=Ochocinco link=topic=88798.msg1066703#msg1066703 date=1317058197]
Top 5 OFFENSES
1.PNG-G 36.6
2.BMT-G 34.2
3.LUM-R 28.6
4.LUM-W 28.4
5.NED -B 23.4

TOP 5 DEFENSES
1.PNG-G 2.4
1.WOS - 2.4
3.BMT-G 3.6
4.LUM-R 4
5.P.A - 8.4
[/quote]

Cool stats...who is your top 5 pee wee teams after that breakdown?
[/quote]

Shame NED-B nowhere in the top defenses, Dont know if the coach is aware of all the deffensive coordinating potential in his help. A few of them lead an undeafted team last season. Did an Excellent job  ;)




























Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...