Jump to content

*Ozen vs. PN-G/PN-G wins 35-20


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest gladiator2
I thought Ozen was going to present some problems with their speed but I never noticed a play where it seemed like they had any advantage with their speed. Their speed was a non-factor in this game, pure domination by the Indian defense. Their line could not block our lineman, their qb caught hell tonight. We were flat at first but then the offense started clicking. The final score and stats will not tell how dominating PNG was in this game. I would think that Ozen had maybe 100 yards of total offense before we pulled all of the starters at the beginning of the 4th quarter. We played again without a couple of starters on the O-line but we were still very productive. Good job Indians, keep working hard! Another great job by the coaching staff!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="sports fan 4ever" post="691965" timestamp="1256963960"]
Great job, Indians.  Our kicker needs work on his kickoffs.
[/quote]

Our kicker was pooch kicking....how can you not see that?  That is designed.  Notice that he is kicking from about 2 yards from the ball.  The one time he did kick it to the the 10, Ozen got the ball to the 40 yard line.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...