BROOMS BROOMS BROOMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!???????????
-
Member Statistics
45,988
Total Members1,837
Most Online
-
Posts
-
By LumRaiderFan · Posted
I’m sure a maniac that would kill 60 folks and wound over 400 would never ignore a ban. -
By CardinalBacker · Posted
By my guess a bump stock ban would have saved roughly half of the lives lost in Vegas. But then again, I forget that your trigger finger is as fast as full auto, so it wouldnt have mattered. -
Out of all of your comments, this might be the most ridiculous; “fight for the right to slaughter kids”. Please point out anyone who believes there is a “right to slaughter kids”… and you call other people nuts? You still don’t answer the questions and go back to emotions. Should people be arrested for something that isn’t a crime? Should the Supreme Court ignore the Constitution in favor of emotions? Would a ban on bump stocks have prevented any crime? -
-
-
-
Topics
-
.jpg.5280c733203c02b00df30cf5e6edbab0.thumb.jpg.1722bbe93d1613cc60ea62c49ac24881.jpg)
Recommended Posts