Jump to content

PN-G talk

indian28

By indian28
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest pngpurplenwhite

Guest pngpurplenwhite

Posted
Posted

alright their starting construction friday and they had to take out 3 million that was goin towards something outside the stadium the concerns are more on the field said the coaches. we sould have a pretty solid team next year to go along with this field

What are they taking away???

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TradinUp BH

TradinUp BH

Posted
Posted

They better not take away from the new schools being built or renovated, or any teacher pay raises for the future. If you don't have enough money, don't build it. This is going to upset alot of people before it's over with. I would also like to know where they are pulling the 3 million dollars from, we know it's not from the buses WITHOUT seatbelts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tribesman

Tribesman

Posted
Posted

There is a special meeting January 10 at 6:00 p.m. at the West Groves Ed. Building. The second item on the agenda is to approve the contract for the stadium. If you are concerned, you should attend and find out what has been cut from the original plans and what the status of the project is at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jake94

jake94

Posted
Posted

This is not a knock at all, but I don't think PN-G will be as good as they were this past season. They lose their primary ball carrier, as well as the majority of a very good defense, and their top 3 wideouts. Wright and Tatum are good players and the O-Line should be solid(it always is), but they have a lot to replace. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NHSBulldogFan

NHSBulldogFan

Posted
Posted

the difference between last years team and this years PNG team is that last years team had most of the defense coming back this year most are gone (except for maybe 1 or 2 starters) PNG will still be a playoff team though because the offense will be good but i dont think theyll be as good as they were in 07

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest kf89

Guest kf89

Posted
Posted

did'nt C.O. WILSON WIN DISTRICT THE LAST 2 OR 3 YEARS,BOTH 7TH &8TH.GOING UNDEAFEATED 2 YRS IN A ROW?IS'NT C.O. A NEDERLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL?HOW IS PNG DOMINATING MIDDLE SCHOOL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Scalpem06

Scalpem06

Posted
Posted

did'nt C.O. WILSON WIN DISTRICT THE LAST 2 OR 3 YEARS,BOTH 7TH &8TH.GOING UNDEAFEATED 2 YRS IN A ROW?IS'NT C.O. A NEDERLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL?HOW IS PNG DOMINATING MIDDLE SCHOOL?

Yes, C.O. Wilson did win it all, but central came in dead last. Groves came in 2nd and Port Neches came in 3rd... I'll take 2nd and 3rd before first and last..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...