Jump to content

Kirbyville @ Lumberton


RaiderGirl2010

Recommended Posts

Kirbyville just played (and lost to) probably one of the best teams Newton has ever assembled....and that's saying a lot. Lumberton just played (and lost to) an avg Jasper team. Anybody in Lumberton thinking this will be an easy game just because Newton throttled us is in for a rude awakening. I pick Kirbyville by one score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WildcatBacker said:

Kirbyville just played (and lost to) probably one of the best teams Newton has ever assembled....and that's saying a lot. Lumberton just played (and lost to) an avg Jasper team. Anybody in Lumberton thinking this will be an easy game just because Newton throttled us is in for a rude awakening. I pick Kirbyville by one score.

I’d say Jasper is above average. Strange thing is only people from Kirbyville think that the team is gonna won this game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

I’d say Jasper is above average. Strange thing is only people from Kirbyville think that the team is gonna won this game

Go back and read the comments^^ again hoss. A Newton fan picked us too. Yall may very well take the win. Who knows? But if you're thinking that you've got us based off of our loss to Newton, then I can assure you you're in for a long night. Newton would take Lumberton to the cleaners just as easily. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WildcatBacker said:

Go back and read the comments^^ again hoss. A Newton fan picked us too. Yall may very well take the win. Who knows? But if you're thinking that you've got us based off of our loss to Newton, then I can assure you you're in for a long night. Newton would take Lumberton to the cleaners just as easily. 

I definitely agree with your last statement 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lumberton may win but will not be a blow out.  I thought the same as most and Kirbyville would gain nothing by playing Newton but I think I was wrong.  They were blown out and stomped last night but still had spurts of confidence.  I was not totally disappointed in what I saw last night.  I think you'll see a different team this week and get better each week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, rykerx144 said:

Lumberton may win but will not be a blow out.  I thought the same as most and Kirbyville would gain nothing by playing Newton but I think I was wrong.  They were blown out and stomped last night but still had spurts of confidence.  I was not totally disappointed in what I saw last night.  I think you'll see a different team this week and get better each week. 

I'm in agreement.  There is size talent and speed at Kirbyville.  One mistake and they can score..  If Lumberton goes in this game thinking pushover they in trouble.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely don’t care who wins and don’t have any idea how this one turns out. 

With these wildly different predictions, I will pay special attention to this game. 

Is Newton really that good? 

Is Kirbyville really that bad?

 Is Lumberton not as good as thought?

and so on......

This week may answer some questions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rykerx144 said:

Yes Newton is that good,  

I think Kirbyville will end up better than some predicted but still no better than 3rd or 4th in district.  

Lumberton may be better than Kirbyville but if they look past them and don't show up because of the score this week.  Then they be get surprised. 

No way Kirbyville takes 4th its Buna all the way. Lumberton 42-KVille 14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s face it Wildcat fans we are in a down year and hopefully are on the track of a rebuilding process 3 head coaches and 3 different systems in the last 3 years. Kirbyville will have a rough season but I do think we will get to the light at the end of the tunnel. However will all that being said I’m going with Lumberton in this one and I won’t throw a prediction out there because I’m to big of a Wildcat fan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...