Rice bowl 2014. Hf -Ec.

[ECFAN#1]

The series is HF 22 EC 19.

Where did you get those stats?

[#62jjohnson]

You can go to lonestarfootball.net and look up the head to head match up between teams . They arent 100% correct on some things but they have somethings like playoff sckres pretty accurate.

[#62jjohnson]

Scores i meant

[Englebert]

Where did you get those stats?

 

From years of collecting them.

[Englebert]

Here's the seres:

 

1961 Hamshire-Fannett 28-0

1962 East Chambers 12-6

1963 East Chambers 12-0

1964 East Chambers 47-0

1965 East Chambers 24-0

1966 East Chambers 24-8

1967 Hamshire-Fannett 24-14

1968 East Chambers 15-0

1969 East Chambers 24-6

1970 East Chambers 24-18

1971 Hamshire-Fannett 6-0

1972 Hamshire-Fannett 14-6

1973 Hamshire-Fannett 21-0

1974 Hamshire-Fannett 40-6

1975 Hamshire-Fannett 19-15

1976 Hamshire-Fannett 25-7

1977 East Chambers 7-6

1978 Hamshire-Fannett 12-6

1979 East Chambers 29-27

1980 Hamshire-Fannett 13-6

1981 Hamshire-Fannett 30-7

1982 East Chambers 28-18

1983 East Chambers 12-10

1984 Hamshire-Fannett 25-6

1985 Hamshire-Fannett 18-17

1986 Hamshire-Fannett 9-8

1987 Hamshire-Fannett 26-6

1988 Hamshire-Fannett 28-12

1989 Hamshire-Fannett 42-14

1990 Hamshire-Fannett 63-6

1991 Hamshire-Fannett 70-0

2000 Hamshire-Fannett 45-12

2001 East Chambers 25-2

2002 Hamshire-Fannett 28-7

2003 Hamshire-Fannett 33-7

2006 East Chambers 20-17

2007 East Chambers 33-19

2009 East Chambers 21-0

2012 East Chambers 33-14

2013 East Chambers 27-23

2014 East Chambers 33-14

[ECFAN#1]

Well Englebert, these look pretty accurate as for as I can tell. I guess it's 22-19 until someone can prove you wrong. Dang it I thought it was closer. LOL   WOSgrad or AAW probably has some insight to what the series is suppose to be. How bout it WOSgrad or AAW, you have any comments?

[texas13]

It might be 22-19 Hf but as of late it's all east chambers

[Englebert]

Well Englebert, these look pretty accurate as for as I can tell. I guess it's 22-19 until someone can prove you wrong. Dang it I thought it was closer. LOL   WOSgrad or AAW probably has some insight to what the series is suppose to be. How bout it WOSgrad or AAW, you have any comments?

 

These scores are identical to the ones WOSGrad has, and identical to many other sources. I'm not sure why you would think the series is "supposed to be" something different. If you don't trust the numbers, do your own research!

[ECFAN#1]

These scores are identical to the ones WOSGrad has, and identical to many other sources. I'm not sure why you would think the series is "supposed to be" something different. If you don't trust the numbers, do your own research!

Did the research and said it look good to me. Some sites had a few differences but I think yours was correct. Where did I say it was suppose to be something different. Looks like you need to do your research about what I say is correct. LOL

[Englebert]

Did the research and said it look good to me. Some sites had a few differences but I think yours was correct. Where did I say it was suppose to be something different. Looks like you need to do your research about what I say is correct. LOL

 

You stated "what the series is supposed to be". Right here...bolded.

 

Well Englebert, these look pretty accurate as for as I can tell. I guess it's 22-19 until someone can prove you wrong. Dang it I thought it was closer. LOL   WOSgrad or AAW probably has some insight to what the series is suppose to be. How bout it WOSgrad or AAW, you have any comments?

 

You also said "until someone can prove me wrong". Do you think the past scores are going to change, or do you think the scores I listed are wrong. That's why I said do your own research.

[ECFAN#1]

They might say the series is suppose to be what you posted. It does not have to be different.