Jump to content

Place your bets ...which team will win district 19-4A this year?


Which team will win district 19-4A this year?  

45 members have voted

  1. 1. Which team will win district 19-4A this year?

    • Barbers Hill
      7
    • C.E. King
      0
    • Crosby
      10
    • Dayton
      11
    • Humble
      0
    • Kingwood Park
      1
    • New Caney
      0
    • Porter
      2
    • Summer Creek
      14


Recommended Posts

[quote name="DemDAWGS!" post="1412205" timestamp="1370803932"]
[quote author=Jackthehammer link=topic=112445.msg1412195#msg1412195 date=1370801231]
BH or Crosby
[/quote]

I really need to see how SC comes out this year.  I know I'm the consumate homer and trash talker, but I had no idea SC was going to be as good as they were last year.  The year before was a surprise too.  So, this year's team could show up even better with more kids that surprise me with their play. On the flip side, they could lay an egg too.  Last year's team had a personality and chemistry.  We lost some key big time players (Greg Hogan, KeVonn Aldrige...), but we have some others in the pipeline like Sydney Holt-Washington and Torrey Johnson (who has been incredible since his sophmore year). Duente Chapman is looking to have a stellar year too.

Our defense is a BIG "if" ...last year's defense was good ...more of a bend but don't break style of defense.  They definitely weren't a defense like Nederland's.  Those guys where the kind of defense that kept their offense in the game.  Dakota Allen will be in his senior year.  I believe everyone is expecting a HUGE year from him.  He'll definitely be the captain.  Really hoping for some new guys to step up and surprise the district.
[/quote]
Another "If" is Honora replacing Matlock at nose guard. He looked pretty good as matlock's backup last year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="liltex" post="1412228" timestamp="1370816004"]
25,000 SC fans @ Turner?Really?I was @ College station for the GT game,you know the last of the mohicans-and there may have been 1,500 on SC side.1/3 of those were just FB fans that came to see a great game ??? ;) ;D
[/quote]they didn't have 3,000 at the BH game lol  ;D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="liltex" post="1412228" timestamp="1370816004"]
25,000 SC fans @ Turner?Really?I was @ College station for the GT game,you know the last of the mohicans-and there may have been 1,500 on SC side.1/3 of those were just FB fans that came to see a great game ??? ;) ;D
[/quote]
To be fair there was only about 2000 capacity on the visitors side. I got there about 20 minutes before kickoff and had trouble finding a seat. But anyway, we are a small but dedicated group of fans at SC. Only 370 alumni (last year anyway, as of May we have around 850-900 alum), usually more parents and younger children than high school students at the games.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote author=bronco pride link=topic=112445.msg1412054#msg1412054 date=1370704629]
Dayton was 9-2 with their 2 losses against 2 of the top 10 teams in the state. For most teams that would be a great season. That was also with almost all our skill position players being sophmores. I just dont see a drop off this year. Not to mention dayton will have the best nose guard they have had in several years which is very important with the 3-4 they run.
[/quote

I'd like to know who the secret nose gaurd is?Tousant the 3 yr starter graduated ??? 8)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="liltex" post="1412301" timestamp="1370877704"]
My pic-ems in order=Crosby-SC-KW Park/Dayt/BH battlin for the last 2 spots
[/quote]secret nose guard is no secret. Jordan Treyhan played o-line last year as a sophmore. He is already bigger than Charles and will be an impact player on the dline. Right now he is probably about 260 and can crush a baseball but thats another story. One more thing liltex. Charles was a 3 year starter on dline not nose. Wright was the nose in 2010. Wright had the size for the position. Charles played it the next 2 years and while he was good he was undersized and out of position. IMO he would have been a better 3tech.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...